Showing posts with label a. s.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label a. s.. Show all posts

Saturday, June 14, 2025

Other people aren't just dumber clones of yourself

Other people aren't just dumber clones of yourself

By R’Kok

Channel: A. S. 

Received on June 14, 2024 by e-mail
 
 

 
 
My dear Earth friends,

I am happy that I can share a message with you once again.

Today I would like to discuss a trap that Earth people frequently fall into, and a trap that I have repeatedly fallen into.

The trap is assuming that anyone who disagrees with you, is automatically dumber than you are.

Or alternatively, that a person who disagrees with you is less informed than you are, or is less spiritually evolved than you are, or is morally inferior to you (they're virtue-signalling, or racist, et cetera).

This is really convenient for the ego, because it lets it maintain the self image that you're the smartest, or the most informed, or the most spiritually evolved, or the most morally upstanding person.

And you're certainly better than that person who disagrees with you, who is clearly dumber or less informed or less evolved or less moral than you are.

Your ego really likes feeling superior to others, and it likes thinking that your current worldview is correct and indeed is superior to the worldview of others.

But the problem, of course, is that sometimes a person who disagrees with you actually isn't dumber, or otherwise inferior to you.

In fact, it's a common ego defense to label smarter or better-informed or more evolved people than yourself as actually being inferior to yourself.

However, doing so means that you learn a lot less things than you could be learning, and you miss opportunities to dispel illusions and misconceptions you might have. And most likely you have those.

One example of this phenomenon is: imagine a person on the other political side. Notice how you're probably picturing someone who is likely inferior to you in some way. Even though there certainly are people on the other political side who are smarter than you, who are more well-read than you, who donate more money to charity than you, who spend more time doing volunteer work, et cetera.

That very thought, that some people on the other political side are superior to you in some way, may be vaguely uncomfortable to you.

Is that vaguely uncomfortable for you? I invite you to take a moment to feel your body.

That's the crux: your ego is trying to meet your surface-level needs, and immediate psychological well-being is one of them. Hence people's tendencies to assume that people who disagree with them are inferior to them.

Yes, this contributes to the resistance of sleepers to wake up.

But spiritual people do it too. A lot of spiritual people are implicitly assuming that people who disagree with them are just less spiritually evolved than them and therefore wrong. They don't say that out loud, but that's what a lot of spiritual people secretly think.

Or spiritual people might make self-serving rules that then "prove" that they're superior to others. For example, a vegan might think that anyone who isn't a vegan automatically isn't as spiritually advanced as them. (I'm not saying all vegans think like this, I'm saying some do.)

Or a dedicated yoga practitioner might think that anyone who isn't doing yoga or something similar automatically isn't as spiritually advanced as them.

Or someone might think that anyone who meditates less or does fewer spiritual retreats automatically isn't as spiritually advanced as them.

Or a person with a following might think that anyone who doesn't have at least as big a following as they do, automatically isn't as spiritually advanced as them.

Or a spiritual person might suppress and ignore everything that isn't happy, and share only the most happy and most spiritual moments on social media, and act in a stereotypically spiritual way. And then that person might think that anyone who isn't as good at performing spirituality as them automatically isn't as spiritually evolved as they are.

Even though actual spiritual masters aren't just someone who conforms really closely to the spiritual stereotype. Actual masters are typically non-standard in some way, or have some non-standard belief or beliefs.

So, how do we avoid this trap where people assume that everyone who has a different worldview than them, is inferior to them?

First of all, you are good enough already, even if someone else is smarter or more informed than you are. Smarter or better-informed or more spiritually advanced people than you existing doesn't somehow make you "not good enough."

In fact, the ability to open-mindedly listen to people with different perspectives, and to occasionally learn from people and change your mind, is a quality in and of itself. It's only the ego that thinks that never changing your opinion is somehow strong or good.

If we're talking about politics: don't only look at the dumbest and most extreme people on the other side. Yes that is egoically pleasing, but there are smart, well-informed, reasonable people on the other side too.

Yes, almost certainly there are uninformed and morally reprehensible people on the other political side who have very dumb reasons for being on that political side. But that doesn't mean that everyone on that political side is like that. Just because some people on the other political side are idiots or evil, doesn't mean that they're all like that.

Try to be fair. So don't just blindly accept any argument that supports your worldview, even if it may be unreliable or poorly argued, while being extremely critical about any argument that doesn't fit your worldview.

Similarly, don't just blindly accept any argument that makes you feel good, even if it may be unreliable or poorly argued, while being extremely critical about any argument that makes you feel bad.

And acknowledge that people are different, and it's not always the case that if only that other person was as smart or well-read or as spiritually advanced or as moral as you were, that they'd think exactly like you did.

People who disagree with you aren't just a dumber clone of yourself.

Instead, different people are actually different. Other people might genuinely think in different ways. They're not just exactly you, except dumber.

They're not just exactly you, except less spiritually evolved.

A mistake I made back in my selfish days was that I thought that psychopathic, cold-blooded, self-interested logic was all there was, and the rest was all just weakness and nonsense.

From my perspective, I could out-logic and out-debate literally anyone.

I disregarded everything that wasn't psychopathic logic as invalid, and then could win any discussion on my home turf. But of course, I was just looking through a very narrow lens.

I was just subjectively and even irrationally labeling the thing I like as being the one valid thing. But there was never any objective reason for why my thing actually was the only valid thing.

That's a bit of an extreme example, but different people put different weights on things like rationality versus emotions, on being kind versus speaking the truth, on the importance of safety versus freedom, et cetera. Different people are different.

If you value a certain thing very highly, then it might be easy to think that of course you're smarter and better informed than everyone else, because after all your worldview is the only one that sufficiently values that thing.

But this doesn't indicate that other people are dumber than you. It may just mean that other people have different values than you. And their values aren't automatically worse than your values.

Other people aren't just dumber clones of yourself.

Also, I would like to talk about one more thing that frankly irritates me, R'Kok, perhaps more than it should.

Many people love Tunia's messages, and are either fine with or actively enjoy that she occasionally talks about sex.

However, some readers, or listeners, have mentioned that Tunia talks excessively often about sex, after her message: "Tunia: What Pleiadians Are Like".

Obviously you're free to have that perspective, yet I would like to give my perspective as well.

I think that if you did a word count on all messages Tunia has ever put out (not just last week's message), you'd be surprised how few words Tunia actually spends talking about sex.

In most messages she doesn't mention sex at all. And in the others the sex talk either serves a larger purpose, or it's just jokes or stories on the side. However sex isn't the main point, nor is it most of the word count. It's not like she's writing the kama sutra here.

Although note that even in the much more pleasure-focused kama sutra, people have in their head that that book is just one sex position after the other. When in reality, the kama sutra isn't predominantly about sex positions.

I guess that if a spiritual book or person talks about sex, especially a woman, that's apparently so scandalous and sticks in the mind so clearly that people think that it's all or mostly about sex. Even though it's not.

Sex is an important part of life, so why would it be bad for sex to also be a part of her messages?

When Tunia jokes "After a century of being with him, I’m still working my husband’s penis like I’m a slave driver" then some people still remember that sentence almost two years later. But do people remember any other sentence from that seventeen-page message? Probably not.

[Channeler's note: Tunia interrupts me to communicate that that sentence was not, in fact, a joke. Now, back to R'Kok.]

And then you can wonder if it's the spiritual book or person that is weird about sex, or if it's the average Earth person or Earth society that is weird about sex.

Who determines what is excessive sex talk, after all? It's not like Tunia is hurting anyone, it's not like sex or human bodies are bad, and it's not like her being different from the norm is automatically bad.

So then, I say to those people who are a bit triggered by Tunia's sex talk: as always it's good to look inwards before you point the finger outwards.

Do you have "sex is shameful" or "bodies are bad" or "women aren't allowed to be openly horny" or "women must be modest" programming?

Or maybe you're in pain that most Pleiadians are having a great time while you're down on Earth? Which would be a completely understandable feeling, but if that's alive in you, then it's good to be aware of that and to observe it.

Or is sexuality something you judge in yourself, or are you unhappy about your own sex life? Again, I empathize, but if so it would be good to observe it.

Personally, when I left my selfish days behind me and I left my fellow reptilians and joined the Pleiadians, I was very repressed and angry and ashamed and stuck in my head.

For me, it required a Pleiadian woman, who was just consistently and authentically herself, to eventually help me break out of my own shell and out of my own head and out of my own prison of mental constructs and illusions and nonsense.

I called her a bitch a few times, because she triggered me, but really she was just being herself and wasn't hurting anyone. Well, she was hurting me, but then again she really wasn't.

I've since apologized to her.

She was alive for me to apologize to her, but she chose to pass on before I was able to actually get over my own nonsense enough to realize that I appreciated her, that I cared for her, and that her authentic weirdness had inspired me and had taught me a great deal.

It is one of the regrets in my life that I wasn't able to get over my own nonsense in time for me to be able to express to her that she actually meant a lot to me. That she was more to me than "well, you're not a bitch. Sorry."

Those were the last words of any substance that I ever said to her. I exchanged a few words with her a couple of times after that, but I didn't say anything meaningful those times. Pathetic.

Maybe I'm projecting, but maybe Tunia, or some other Pleiadian woman, can be the authentic teacher who helps you get over some of your nonsense. Not by any particular technique of hers, but just by her being her own authentic weird self. And sometimes maybe by triggering the heck out of you.

Good. Get triggered.

Get triggered to hell and back.

Get triggered until your castle of nonsense collapses in on itself.

And I pray that when your castle of nonsense finally collapses, and you finally get over yourself, that woman will still be alive for you to be able to express to her just how much she means to you.

I'm projecting, I'm triggered, and I'm crying.

Uh, end of message.

A. S. 

For Era of Light

These channelings are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post.

If you are interested in local meetings with other people also seeking first contact with benevolent ETs, then please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/ . If you search with control-F for @, then you can quickly find email addresses of those who are organizing local groups. It’s also not too late to post a new (secondary) email address yourself to start a new local group, because we plan to keep linking to that post for the foreseeable future.


 

Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from: 

Saturday, June 7, 2025

What Pleiadians are like

What Pleiadians are like

Tunia via channel A. S.

Posted on June 7, 2025

 



My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Tunia speaking. I love you so very much.

From your perspective, us Pleiadians look like pretty Scandinavians. And many Earth people are under the impression that this is a good description of our character and our society too -- we're just beautiful, spiritually advanced Scandinavians with spaceships.

It's logical that you think this, because while we don't lie, Earth channelers can only bring forth so much information at a time. So we have to make choices in what we talk about, and usually we would rather say that we love you and that you're doing great, or give you information directly relevant to Earth, rather than talk about ourselves.

But we are a bit different from Earth humans, as we will explore in this message.

Physical differences

We indeed look like slender, pretty Scandinavians, but we're a bit taller than Earth humans are. Not hugely so, but the average Pleiadian woman is slightly taller than the average Earth man is, for example. And our men are a bit taller than our women, as is the case with Earth humans.

In some of the images you have, our men are depicted as quite muscled. While obviously people are different, in general we're more slender and fit than muscular. Even our military men are fit and well-trained but don't tend to have big muscles, because galactic combat is mostly determined by speed and psychic ability and technology use and who can get the jump on the other, rather than by raw physical strength.

Trying to beat a hostile reptilian via punching or wrestling is a bad idea even for a Pleiadian with big muscles. The bigger reptilians can literally just tear humans limb from limb. It's safer to just disable them from a distance, via either technology or psychic ability use.

That said, while our military men don't have big muscles, they are strong. They take what we roughly think of as supplements, but what you would probably think of as steroids without side effects. These don't give people large muscles but do make them quite strong. Personally I don't take those because I have no need for a large amount of physical strength, but it's available.

I get that from an Earth perspective you might think "but why wouldn't you take those yourself?" But from my perspective, why would I take supplements that I don't need?

We often wear those tight suits we're often depicted with on Earth. They tend to be pretty plain. We're looking more at energy than at clothing. We do like to express ourselves, but we do that more via our energy and activities.

Our typical clothing isn't as loose as Earth clothes are, and we do not have shame around our bodies. This means that unlike in your images, sometimes our nipples or the outline of a penis is visible beneath our clothing. We don't go out of our way to either show or hide this -- it's just our bodies. Everyone has a body, after all. We simply wear clothing, and sometimes those things are visible, and sometimes they aren't, and it's no big deal.

We do understand that you see things differently, so we might ensure that nipples and penis outlines aren't visible when we make physical contact with you. When you first get in contact with Pleiadians, they might be diplomatic and careful not to offend Earth sensibilities too much.

When we start wearing our normal clothing around you, and you see occasional nipples or penis outlines, that might mean that we've decided that you're cool and we don't need to act diplomatically around you and we can just be ourselves.

Energy

We use energy much more often and more consciously than Earth humans do.

Often we identify others via their energy, for example. If we send a telepathic message to someone who knows us, often we don't say our names, because the other person will just identify us by our energy. They'll just sense who the other person is.

On Earth energy plays a role in determining whether one person likes another. This plays an even greater role with us.

Sometimes Earth humans ask: "how can Pleiadians possibly be open to dating us Earth humans?" Well, most Pleiadians aren't likely to start dating Earth humans. That said, energy can be a part of that answer. Your mastery of the light and dark, and your willingness to stand in the light in a dark environment, are attractive to some Pleiadians.

We are more open and sensitive. Which is great in our society, but it does mean that for example sometimes us Pleiadian women sometimes cry when we feel into the energies of Earth, because the suffering and pain and loneliness does hit us hard.

On the other hand, it also means that when the channeler is telepathically talking to his Pleiadian twin flame and he hears music, sometimes she just spontaneously starts dancing, or at least starts moving to the music, and he gets a mental image of that. That's another part of being more open and more sensitive.

Some of us are pure and quite energetically powerful. For example, when the channeler's twin flame doesn't hold in her energy and is just fully energetically present with him, then he has a slight feeling like he's basking in the presence of a goddess. So she usually does hold in her energy when she's talking to him or giving him an energetic hug. (This channeler hasn't physically met Pleiadians yet.)

Giving an energetically powerful Pleiadian a handshake or hug, if they don't hold in their energy, could feel wonderful, or intense, or lead to a slight energetic activation.

In galactic society strangers don't typically greet each other via some form of touch, because touch means having an energy exchange.

Obviously we wouldn't do the following, but if an energetically powerful Pleiadian physically stood in front of an Earth person and didn't hold in their energy and said "jump off a bridge" then the Earth human would feel a substantial urge to do so. Most likely they would ultimately not do so, because it's obviously a stupid idea. However if that Pleiadian said something even vaguely reasonable, then that Earth human might very well do it even if he wouldn't do so otherwise.

This is what happens if an energetically powerful Pleiadian from their perspective just stands in front of an Earth person and talks normally, without holding in their energy. So I'm not talking about psychic mind control here -- which yes, some of us can also do, even though we wouldn't without consent.

In the rare cases that we use mind control with consent, it's usually for moving someone's body in a specific way to achieve a certain task, or for teaching someone how they can move their body in order to do certain things.

If you're curious, being psychically mind controlled doesn't feel like you're somehow compelled to do a certain thing. Instead it feels like: "your body moves before your conscious mind is even aware of what's happening." It doesn't feel like you're being forced to make certain decisions, instead it feels like there's no decision input from you at all.

Religion

Many Pleiadians want to ultimately serve Source. Their way of doing that is typically by doing useful things for our society and being kind to others, because Pleiadians trust that their society and their leadership is aligned with Source. Our higher-up decision makers are the ones actively making sure that their society's direction is aligned with Source.

Pleiadians may give thanks to Source, but typically don't directly ask Source, or angels, for help. Usually we instead solve problems via psychic abilities, asking other galactic races for help or technology. That said, Earth is teaching us to request help from angels a bit more often than we previously did, because the situation on Earth is so complicated that we can certainly use the help.

We don't have religious laws, and we barely have any normal laws. Perhaps laws are necessary in lower-consciousness societies, but to us having many laws just feels like a soft form of enslavement. If people are cared for and loved, they will just act harmoniously without being forced to do so by laws.

Mind reading

We also don't feel like we need to hide any part of ourselves, and we're fine with constantly being mind-read by other Pleiadians. Privacy just sounds lonely to us.

Being fully mind-read by someone who is fully present and loving and non-judgemental is a wonderful thing. At least, that's what it feels like to us. We don't feel like we have to hide or be ashamed of any part of us.

We can put up a "don't mind read me" wall and that is respected, but we rarely do so.

We do sometimes put up a "don't mind read me" wall for the purposes of having slightly kinky sex, in the same way that you might use a blindfold in the bedroom -- suddenly your partner doesn't know what's coming anymore.

Another mind-reading-related version of slightly-kinky sex we have is: "I'm going to sexually stimulate you, and I'll read your mind to keep you on the edge for as long as I want, and thereby I'll determine when you orgasm."

If we engage in that type of sexual edging play, we can actually be a little ruthless and intense and give the other quite a hard time. After all, we have nice things all the time, so having a quite challenging experience can be a treat for us.

In your society where people have lots of challenges and rarely have nice things, people want more nice things. A nice thing is a treat.

In our society where we have lots of nice things and rarely have challenges, people want more challenges. A challenge is a treat.

And besides, we see challenging experiences as just... experiences. Plus if you've already done the nice things for a few hundred years, you want some variety.

So if you end up in bed with a Pleiadian someday who proposes sexual edging play and you agree... well you might get edged harder than you expected. Our brand of kindness can be giving someone a new, and not necessarily easy experience. It will ultimately be mind blowing though.

And if you think "I'm into that, bring it on" -- yeah well, what you're picturing is probably less intense than what I'm picturing, and what others have consensually done to me, and what I have consensually done to others.

Those were dark days, before I found my husband.

Free will and boundaries are obviously respected, and we're mind-readers so we're not going to do something that actually harms the other person. And obviously most of our sex is just gentle and nice.

If one Pleiadian is attracted to another, and they mind read that the other Pleiadian is single and likes them too, then the Pleiadian might just slowly step in to kiss them. They don't ask for consent, but do move slowly enough that the other person has the opportunity to give a "no."

Kissing on Earth often means "I like you", but in the Pleiades it can mean "I think I might like you, let's have an energy exchange via a kiss in order to find out if we do like each other."

Pleiadians are usually more internally aligned and less confused than Earth humans are. I realize that if an Earth human just slowly stepped in and kissed someone, then it might lead to a messy situation where the other person might be physically attracted back but also have anxiety and unresolved bad previous experiences, and be confused and internally split, and it wouldn't be good.

So we do understand that when interacting with Earth humans, if we want to kiss them, we should ask for consent first.

If you're wondering if you can just slowly step in and kiss us: we won't get offended if you do. And obviously just asking us is fine too. But most likely if you stand in front of us and that thought or urge crosses your mind, the Pleiadian will just mind read that and state what they are and aren't interested in with you, and what their boundaries and intentions are.

In fact, the channeler's twin flame sometimes even responds to his subconscious thoughts before he is consciously aware of them. So she might say seemingly out of nowhere: "you'll do great tomorrow." He'll reply "huh, what do you mean?" And she'll say: "you're subconsciously anxious about tomorrow. But don't worry, you'll do great."

And hey, if it's observed, it can be let go off, and then it doesn't keep spooking around in your subconscious.

Interacting with someone is just so much easier if you can mind read each other, or at least if one person can mind read the other. Frankly, I don't know how Earth humans interact with people without mind reading them. It seems like a headache to me.

We feel loved

Us Pleiadians feel loved, and feel safed, and feel cared for.

A consequence of this is that we feel no urgency to make a name for ourselves, to be exceptional, to do things to stand out, to get attention from others, et cetera. Indeed, most Pleiadians are perfectly happy to lead normal lives and not try to get a large amount of things or fame. Most Pleiadians are perfectly content with not ending up in our version of the history books.

Because of this, Pleiadians are generally happy to give and provide and help and contribute. After all, we're taken care of already, and our cups are already overflowing.

When we look at Earth humans, we often see that they have been dramatically under-loved, and we generally see that as one of your biggest issues. And I think you're amazing and fully worthy of love -- I wouldn't have done as well as you have if I had been born on Earth! You're amazing, and you're doing very well.

Pleiadian women see giving large amounts of love to people as one of their contributions, and they understand that saying "don't do this, do that instead" isn't very effective if people don't feel loved first. Besides, people are just generally competent if only they're loved and their needs are met.

Plus, what you might see as a mistake, we may just see a valid choice that leads to experiences. All roads lead back to Source, after all.

If us Pleiadians can't easily find a partner, we can ask an AI to play matchmaker and arrange a date with an interested and compatible person. This is quite effective, and in the future this may become common on Earth as well.

A downside is that us Pleiadians actually tend to be slightly less creative problem solvers than Earth humans are. After all, we're cared for already and we don't need to do creative problem solving in order to get our needs met. And our society is so well-structured, and we have AI that can help, so a lot of challenges that arise in your daily life just don't arise in our lives. Therefore we simply don't practice creative problem solving as much as you do.

This channeler's Pleiadian twin flame is often impressed when he uses items in improvised ways to accomplish certain tasks or do certain home repairs. In your eyes this wouldn't be very noteworthy, but from our perspective this is remarkably creative. Us Pleiadians would simply get the conventional, perfect object or tool and then do things by the book. Or we'd ask AI to do the task for us.

We don't lay on the beach all day

We're not forced to work.

However, from our perspective, our society isn't perfect but is really nice. So we feel a certain pull to work to maintain it, both morally and also because we want our children to have an amazing society.

We're also aware that some people, such as Earth humans, are suffering very much and need help. And of course, you're us and we're you, so we do feel a responsibility to help.

And certain races like reptilians pose a threat to an extent. If us Pleiadians literally just lay on the beach all day, well, we would get invaded.

So the average Pleiadian certainly has plenty of downtime, but we do put in a decent amount of working hours as well.

Pleiadian men

Pleiadian men typically choose a field and because they live such long lives compared to yours, they tend to become extremely good at that field.

I don't mean to say that men constantly do the same menial labor -- AI takes care of all that kind of work. I mean to say that a Pleiadian man might be an extremely good engineer, or soldier, or researcher, or spiritual teacher, or diplomat, or cook, or doctor, et cetera.

Pleiadian men are generally competent, non-needy, secure, helpful, generous, responsible and level-headed. They're happy to mentor or teach or lead people where it's welcome and appropriate. They're not afraid to express emotions, but they're just pretty emotionally stable overall. The only time the channeler has experienced a Pleiadian man being quite emotional was when the topic of the severe mistreatment of Earth human children was brought up.

While bad hierarchies are bad, in some situations things just work better if there's a hierarchy. In the military you need soldiers and you need a commander. In the emergency medical room you need to have one person who ultimately makes the decisions. Mind reading makes it easy to determine who is most competent and hence who should be put on top of the hierarchy.

Pleiadian men, like Pleiadian women, like to move their bodies. A lot of them like to dance, or run, or swim, or have sex, or do some basic military training.

Some Pleiadian men like to cook, but what's more common is that neither a Pleiadian husband nor wife can cook particularly well, and they just go to shared eating halls where Pleiadian expert cooks serve delicious meals. It's a fun way to talk to people outside of your direct family. And sometimes there are shows or fun activities, either during or shortly after the meal.

If a Pleiadian cook isn't available, for example if someone is on some kind of trip, then machines can make perfectly adequate meals.

Pleiadian men have high standards, they can be no-nonsense, they prioritize their family and they are unafraid of working hard.

The channeler's twin flame is trying to write Earth-related articles and get them submitted to the galactic network (a shared repository of knowledge that galactics can download information from). And because she isn't a professional researcher she's finding it hard to get her articles past a certain male peer reviewer. That peer reviewer is kind and gives good feedback and is willing to help, but he also has very high standards and won't accept anything that doesn't meet those standards.

As another anecdote: one time the channeler volunteered to do lightwork for a male Pleiadian who was working on a specific project. The channeler understood that he could state boundaries and quit any time, and the Pleiadian mind read that the channeler knew that. So the Pleiadian asked the channeler to do an amount and intensity of lightwork that was very tiring for the channeler. And the Pleiadian knew that, but kept unapologetically making lightwork requests, since from a utilitarian perspective the channeler's fatigue was a low cost to help out the collective.

Fairness isn't really a concept in Pleiadian society. We think more in terms of "people should be able to lead the lives they want, and their free will shouldn't be violated." Sure, that is sort of like fairness, but if someone's soul chooses a hard path, then the result may not seem fair to that person's conscious mind, but we think that's fine -- it's just a soul's free-will choice.

Pleiadians, like most or all positive spiritually advanced beings, have "prevent suffering" slightly lower on their list of priorities than Earth humans do. After all, ultimately you're a reincarnating soul, and souls can generally choose a comfy life nearly free of suffering in for example the Pleiades, or something like an Earth life -- which involves more suffering but also more soul growth.

Of course, we do still want to work to reduce suffering, it's just lower on our list of priorities. And we also weigh up things like soul growth and what people's souls want. This is illustrated by the fact that we haven't yet launched a massive open intervention to immediately liberate Earth, for example.

Pleiadian men tend to be either humorous, or playful, or at least they see things in a way that to them is funny. Hakann and Ashtar are actually less humorous and playful than the average Pleiadian man is, perhaps due to their large amount of responsibilities, or perhaps that's just what they're like.

One Pleiadian spiritual teacher who this channeler works with has introduced himself as Praneer. And anytime the channeler thinks "Praneer" to contact him, Praneer replies with "yes I'm here" and is vaguely amused to give a rhyming response. It's not the most humorous thing in the universe, but Praneer enjoys doing that.

The channeler experiences energetic hugs from Hakann as incredibly comforting and calming and stress-reducing.

Pleiadian women

Pleiadian women typically do some amount of work, though a bit less than the men do. This isn't mandated, this is just what people choose to do.

For example, the channeler's twin flame spends about two and a half to three hours per Earth day teaching children, plus she spends about another thirty to sixty minutes preparing lessons.

Us Pleiadian women are also a bit more likely to occasionally switch to some new job, and not become a dedicated expert in one field as our men tend to do.

We spend a bit more time than the men on visiting friends and family, and we spend a bit more time relaxing and having fun.

And yes, I do think that us Pleiadian women have got ourselves an amazing deal -- we don't work as much as the men, we're loved and we have everything we need.

The men genuinely are happy too. Just as men feel they have the role to provide and protect where necessary, us Pleiadian women feel that we have the role to love and support people, certainly including men. Men are very competent, but they do need love, and we can help provide that. Of course, we are loved too.

Another role that the men feel they have is to keep their wives sexually satisfied.

It's usually our men making an effort to keep their wives satisfied, rather than the other way around. After all, Pleiadian couples tend to be very attracted to each other, and female bodies are overall just better able to have a lot of sex.

Every man thinks he wants a high-libido partner, until he actually has one.

Yes, we also tend to love babies and children. Sometimes when the channeler happens to see a small child, he'll hear a telepathic "look how adorable he / she is! Awwwww. I want children toooooo" if his twin flame happens to be looking through his eyes at that moment.

Pleiadian women tend to be mostly feminine but also pretty well-balanced in their feminine and masculine energy. So we're happy to follow our partner and be feminine if he takes the lead. But if he's struggling, we can take the metaphorical wheel of the ship for a while if needed. Plus it's fun to occasionally be the ones to organize something.

And, you know, if it were up to men, we'd only have nice and pleasurable and orderly things. Can you imagine the horror?

So occasionally a girl's gotta spice things up, make things interesting.

No worries, usually my husband can get us out of the mess that I got us into.

That's when my husband compliments me by calling me a chaos goblin. At least, I'm choosing to hear that as a compliment.

Did you know you can do that, just choosing to hear things as compliments? Free life hack right there.

Now, some long-time readers might think that I'm too submissive to my husband. Well, to an extent, I am submissive to my husband. I don't see that as a bad thing.

Still, first of all, I'm not really the Earth ideal of the chaste virgin bride. I certainly didn't try to preserve my virginity when I was younger and hadn't yet met my now-husband.

Plus I think the idea that some Earth men have that women should dress modestly is pretty silly. I'll wear (or not wear) what I want. Sunshine on bare skin is healthy, you know. And sure, I won't get mad if you look.

If you can't handle seeing a human body, that's not my problem. Do some yoga exercises to deal with excessive lust if it's bothering you.

Second, I do generally prioritize my husband and my children over myself -- which I think is fair, because he spends a substantially larger amount of time working than I do, which benefits society.

It's not like my husband is prioritizing himself over everything else. He works, and he makes small sacrifices on his end for the benefit of myself and our children. It's not like he's leading a hedonistic lifestyle where he puts himself first.

Still, I do make choices that I really want to make even if my husband has a slight preference for me not doing that. For example, my husband would prefer that I not be a chaos goblin occasionally, but ultimately he doesn't mind it too much if I keep it within certain boundaries. So sometimes I indulge, and let the chaos goblin energy flow through me.

Besides, it's led to some great stories, and to some great... well, it's led to some memories, alright.

As a mind reader, it's always interesting to have an experience with someone, and then compare your memory of it to the other person's memory of it. It shows that attitude and worldview and optimism really do a lot to change how we perceive and remember things. Although of course, in this particular chaos goblin situation, it's easy for me to talk.

Well, that's all that comes to mind right now about what we Pleiadians are like.

You're doing amazing, and I can't wait to meet you.

When I land, maybe I'll wear an especially tight suit that shows my nipples poking through, and I'll count how many Earth people have sexual thoughts about me.

And maybe I can convince my husband or a male friend to wear tight clothing too, and see how many people have sexual thoughts about him.

Look, I don't WANT to give dozens of Earth men an erection, but I gotta do it. For science, you know.

I should pitch this "will a male or female Pleiadian in an especially tight suit make more people aroused" idea as a research project.

At the very least I expect that I'll get a "chaos goblin" compliment out of my husband.

Or when I give someone an erection, I could walk up to him and say: "hello, I'm Tunia. I saw you looking at my breasts and then getting an erection. No need to deny it, it's fine, I also think I have nice breasts. Look, I'm happily married, but I have a couple of single friends, and they look somewhat similar to me. So tell me a bit about yourself and what you're looking for, and maybe I can arrange a date for you -- Source knows that some of my friends are slacking when it comes to finding a husband, after all."

And then I'll probably realize that the Earth man hasn't heard a word I said, because he is still looking at my breasts.

Ah well. You win some, you lose some.

Or maybe when a guy gets an erection from seeing me, I'll quickly walk behind a wall. Then my husband walks up to that guy and says: "look at the outline of my penis under my clothing. Okay, now that you're no longer hypnotized by my wife, please sign up to Tunia's dating service."

Wait, that'll get foiled by horny bisexuals, who will then be hypnotized by my husband's magnificent penis.

Drat.

Ah well, at least the phrase "hypnotized by my husband's magnificent penis" has now been put on the Earth's internet, where quite possibly your AIs will eventually read it. So a few years from now, try asking your AIs whether the penis of Tunia's husband is magnificent or not. It should know the correct answer then.

Anyway.

Not every Earth human will be able to find a Pleiadian partner, but some people will.

And don't worry, our decision makers understand that I'm an acquired taste and that I shouldn't be unleashed upon Earth until a more responsible group of Pleiadians has made the very first contact.

So somewhere in the future you should have at least a couple of amazing days of first contact, before the chaos goblin gets unleashed.

I mean, I also wouldn't let me be part of the first contact group.

Don't worry -- most Pleiadians are much more reasonable than I am.

With all my love,

Your star sister,

Tunia


 
These channelings are submitted to EraofLight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to this original post.

If you are interested in local meetings with other people also seeking first contact with benevolent ETs, then please see https://eraoflight.com/. If you search with control-F for @, then you can quickly find email addresses of those who are organizing local groups. It’s also not too late to post a new (secondary) email address yourself to start a new local group, because we plan to keep linking to that post for the foreseeable future.
 

Wednesday, June 4, 2025

Pendulum Swings

Pendulum Swings

Hakann trough A. S.

Posted on June 4, 2025

 



My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.

Many of you rationally know the concept of the pendulum swing. Namely: if society is first unbalanced in one direction, then later it will become unbalanced in the opposite direction.

For example, to hugely generalize a complex topic: in ages past women were treated poorly by society, and now men are being treated poorly by society. Which isn’t justice; rather, it’s injustice in the opposite direction. And injustice in the opposite direction isn’t going to heal society.

Or: in ages past society was too weird and shameful about sex, yet now arguably young people aren’t warned sufficiently that having a hookup with someone they actually really like can be damaging, because that other person will then leave (it’s a hookup after all) and that may really hurt.

Although in this case the pendulum seems to be slowly swinging back again, away from casual sex.

There are many other examples.

Now, this pendulum swing is a concept that many people rationally understand, but haven’t integrated. And rationally understanding something, without having integrated it, isn’t that useful.

By this, I mean that many of you already knew what I just shared. You rationally understand the concept of the pendulum swing.

Yet, many of you don’t see all of the ways in which you personally are being influenced by the pendulum swing, and all the ways in which your society is currently being influenced by pendulum swings.

For example: society too strongly used to try and control what people were doing, and too strongly tried to force them into a particular way of living and a worldview. So for example, in the West, you were expected to be a Christian and go to church.

A pendulum swing against that is that many people have become atheistic and very individualistic.

But you can’t strip the divine out of your life without losing something — or in fact, losing a whole lot. Indeed, it can be argued that modern Earth people have replaced the divine with the mainstream narrative. Argue against the mainstream narrative and many people will treat you as a heretic — even if you cite doctors or scientists. Some people want scientists to be censored in order to defend the mainstream narrative.

Also, while I understand that it wasn’t ideal to expect everyone to be a Christian and go to church — the current atomization of people also isn’t ideal. Most people are social beings and frankly would do better living with their family or living in a community, than they do living alone.

If you want to find like-minded people, see the link under this message.

The current atomization of people has also led some lightworkers to say: I cannot solve the problems of Earth by myself, therefore galactics must intervene now.

Now yes, it’s hard for one person to solve the problems of Earth. But anyone who says this is looking through an excessively individualistic lens, from my perspective. Namely: sure it’s hard for one person to fix Earth society, but there’s no need to go at it alone. Together you can fix Earth society. So you just need to contribute your piece to the puzzle, not solve the entire puzzle by yourself.

You can look at lightworkers as lots of individual people, or you can look at them as a group that is being guided to work together and to contribute in ways that you often aren’t even consciously aware of. By following your guidance, many of you are synergistically working together with other lightworkers, perhaps ones you’ve never even met.

Going back to the concept of the pendulum swing — if you want to integrate this concept, it’s good to realize that if anyone pushes excessively far in one direction, then that person is creating a future pendulum swing in the opposite direction.

So for example, the mainstream American left has lost its way in my view. They’ve put ideology before realism and practicality, and they’re excessively invested in identity politics and in declaring that the right wing is evil.

In fact, the mainstream left has been so ideological and so quick to call people racists or nazis, that currently there’s a pendulum swing going on against the left.

However, if you’re a right-winger who says that there’s nothing good about mainstream left-wing ideology, or if you say that all leftists are bad, then you’re creating a future pendulum swing against the right.

It’s better to have a nuanced view and to see that there are good left-wingers, and there are bad right-wingers, and there are good aspects of mainstream left-wing ideology, and there are flaws in mainstream right-wing ideology. That way, you’re not creating a future pendulum swing in the opposite direction.

So. Can you think of other examples of pendulum swing movements that are going on in society? Or perhaps pendulum swings that are going on in your personal life — that you were first imbalanced in one direction, and now you’re imbalanced in another direction?

With all my love,

Your star brother,


Hakann

A. S.,

If you want to meet like-minded Earth humans, please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/

If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://channelings.substack.com/p/hakann-onion-healing

 

Saturday, May 24, 2025

It’s Not Normal How Men Are Being Treated

It’s Not Normal How Men Are Being Treated

Hakann trough A. S.

Posted on May 10, 2025

 



My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.

To start out, I would like to invite you to consider how absurdly discriminatory many modern statements about men would be, if you swapped out the word “men” for the word “Jew.”

For example, it’s normal to say that men are bad in a certain way, or that men rig society to unfairly benefit men (old boys network), or to talk about “man up”, or to say “real man”, or to say “he’s one of the good men”, or to say “he has small dick energy” or “he is compensating for something.” It’s also normal to celebrate a women’s-only initiative.

Now imagine a person saying that Jews are bad in a certain way, or that Jews rig society to unfairly benefit Jews (old Jews network), or to talk about “Jew up”, or to say “real Jew”, or to say “he’s one of the good Jews”, or to say “he has circumcised dick energy.” Or imagine a “white people only” initiative or a “no Jews allowed” initiative.

Women would likely speak up against those anti-Jew statements (or against similar anti-black or anti-female statements). But then why isn’t she speaking up against anti-male statements?

Because men are the privileged ones? They’re not, if we’re talking about the West in 2025. And obviously, collective punishment isn’t justice.

The theory that men rig society to benefit men also clearly isn’t true, because there are female-only scholarships while already more women attend university. Also, far more money is spent on breast cancer research than on prostate cancer research. This wouldn’t be the case if men were actually rigging society to benefit men.

Furthermore: “Wales gives 77 times as much money to women’s groups than men’s groups”: 

Let’s imagine that you lived in a world where four out of five people who killed themselves were women, yet 77 times as much money was given to men’s groups. That would be completely outrageous, and people would insist that that be changed immediately.

Women would shout this unfairness from the rooftops, justifiably so, and they would expect men to speak out on their behalf, or even literally march in the streets in protest to help them out. They wouldn’t accept “can’t help, because I’m busy” type of arguments from men. And indeed, many men would speak up, even without women asking them to.

Well, the world you actually live in is one where four out of five people who kill themselves are men, yet 77 times as much money is given to women’s groups (in Wales, but it’s similar elsewhere). And this situation should be seen as equally outrageous.

If women want equality, then the same expectation should be placed on women that in this case they speak out to support men, and that they speak out to demand an end to structural unfairness against men.

Indeed, men who speak out for men’s rights don’t get listened to, and they may get fired from their job for it. Even the term “men’s rights activist” is a dirty word that’s thought of as more or less a synonym for “woman hater.” So men can’t fix this issue by themselves — they need women to help them. Because while people won’t listen to men saying it, they will actually listen if a woman says we should treat men better.

Now yes, there also exist individual, isolated men who discriminate against women. And that is bad. But it’s not nearly of the same caliber as the structural, governmentally-supported anti-male discrimination that exists.

Plus, everyone already agrees that anti-female discrimination is bad, and judges will convict people for provably engaging in it. However, many people don’t see anti-male discrimination as bad, and judges actually join in on the discrimination against men, for example by structurally giving women lighter sentences than men for the same crimes.

A counter argument might be “I’m a woman and I’m not speaking up against anti-male or anti-female discrimination, so I’m being even-handed.” That’s not actually being even-handed, because if you live in the West in 2025, you live in a society that doesn’t structurally discriminate against women but does structurally discriminate against men. If your group is privileged because the other group is being discriminated against, then it’s not even-handed to just keep quiet.

Maybe it was fair that 100 years ago women only pushed for women’s rights. But it’s not fair today.

Now, I do get that society is harsh on women, and that it is in some way uniquely harsh on women, and that women are scared. But on the whole, society is even harsher against men than it is against women.

Again, see for example the fact that four out of five people who kill themselves are men. And blaming that on men’s poor choices would be a milder version of pointing to black people’s poor choices back when courts and governments were structurally and openly discriminating against them. It’s victim-blaming.

And yes, governments giving 77 times as much money to female groups, and courts giving harsher sentences for the same crimes to men, is open and structural discrimination by governments and courts against men.

See as well: “[The UK] government no longer places girls in Young Offender Institutions” (but of course boys are still placed there): 

Also see this study, which finds that mental health professionals are more willing to treat and refer suicidal female patients than suicidal male patients: 

Even purely for women, this is bad in the medium term. First of all, those suffering men are your husbands and sons and nephews and fathers, and are the future husbands of your daughters.

Second, if one gender is mistreated, that negatively affects the other gender too. This is true both on a subtle spiritual level, but also just on the practical level that men do the vast majority of the heavy, dirty, dangerous work that is needed to keep society running. I don’t foresee women being eager to start doing half of the sewer-related and garbage collection work.

Third, this female unfairness, and the silence from the majority of the good women on the matter, will turn people against women in general in the medium term.

One example of that is that more and more men have stopped looking for a girlfriend. Which is understandable to a degree — if women lived in a society that structurally discriminated against them, would they date a man who was unwilling to speak out against that? And if most men were like that, wouldn’t that make a woman just not want to date?

Now, men are less likely to publicly make those kinds of arguments and quite possibly get fired for them, than they are to just stay at home and play video games. But yes, women’s conduct is lessening some men’s desire to date. And it’s causing some men to only look for hookups and not committed relationships.

Women on Earth sometimes go on a sex strike if they’re displeased. Well, some men are on an informal marriage strike. It’s not uncommon for men to tell each other things like: “half of all marriages end in divorce, and the vast majority of divorces are initiated by women, and usually the man isn’t doing something horrible such as cheating or abusing her. So then, why sign a contract that the other party is rewarded for breaking? You shouldn’t. So, don’t marry. If you want sex, just find a hookup.”

If you don’t believe me: Helen Smith wrote a book titled “Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters”

So women’s mistreatment of men is in the medium term hurting women too.

Or to give an extreme example of this rising anti-female sentiment: it’s getting more popular among some young men to express among themselves the opinion that women shouldn’t be able to vote. Sometimes this is formulated as “repeal the 19th”, referring to the US 19th amendment.

Now that is absolutely a minority position, but if men get painted as the societal evil anyway, and if they feel that women are unfair against them (which women currently are) and that women vote in left-wing ways that are detrimental to the country… then “women shouldn’t be able to vote” isn’t a justified position but it is an understandable one.

While I don’t think that the female vote will actually get taken away, I can see the gender war becoming even more extreme in the future, absent outside events or interventions. And if you don’t think there’s a gender war going on right now: the bitter left-right divide in politics is sort of a gender war in disguise.

The solution to this rising anti-female sentiment among young men isn’t to ban speech or to police young men, or to try and stop young men from talking to each other. The solution to this is to actually be fair.

Also, when our galactic decision-makers discuss among themselves whether Earth humans are ready for open galactic context, then usually some of them will argue: not yet, because Earth humans haven’t even learned to be fair to Earth humans of another race or sex, so clearly they’re not ready for galactic contact.

Certainly this isn’t the only consideration, and not all of our decision-makers think this way. But yes, the way that men are treated on Earth is one of the factors that is slowing down open galactic contact.

Suppose you were us. Would you think that a world was ready to be part of galactic civilization if their popular culture, popular discourse, governments and courts openly and structurally discriminated against women?

You might think “wait, we’re not discriminating like that against women, we’re discriminating like that against men.” Yes, but that’s equally bad in our eyes. We view discrimination against men as being just as bad and abnormal as discrimination against women.

A whole lot of especially young men are leading lives of quiet desperation. Things aren’t as bad on average for slightly older men (although things certainly are still not great for them). However things are really awful for young men especially.

Now yes, Earth women do carry around ancestral trauma and that is impacting their behavior. On one hand, I genuinely am terribly sorry about how Earth women have been treated historically. It is awful and completely unacceptable. And of course, some individual men even at present mistreat women in absolutely horrible ways.

Still, ultimately, being abused doesn’t justify you turning into an abuser yourself (or becoming callous about the suffering of people who were born into the same group as that abuser was from).

That is a very common pattern, but it’s not justified.

The idea that specifically women should be helped, is motivated by the argument that it’s mostly women who are the victims of violence or rape. But that argument is overblown:

Men are more often the victims of violence than women are.

Research paper https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/ states that “In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases.”

Similarly, 
reports 5.5% of men and 4.5% of women experiencing physical violence by an intimate partner. So more men than women are physically abused by their intimate partner.

Similarly, research paper 
states: “Results showed that 2.9% of men and 1.7% of women reported experiencing physical and/or sexual IPV [intimate partner violence] in their current relationships in the last 5 years.”

And wikipedia page 
states, with sources, that probably more American men than women are raped if you include prison rape in the statistics.

Perhaps you’re wondering how this can be true because stories you hear around you are from female victims and rarely from male victims. Well, it’s because female victims get sympathy and help when they speak out, while male victims are seen as pussies and weak men, or perhaps as guys who got lucky because a woman decided to rape them. So male victims often just don’t say anything — if they do, things only get worse for them.

Four out of five people who kill themselves are men. Is that starting to make more sense now?

Lives of quiet desperation, indeed.

So the image isn’t true that violence and rape is nearly always done by a man to a woman. But then why should nearly all the help and consideration and protection go towards women? How bad does it need to get before people start being willing to give equal help to men?

Now a counterargument might be: “overall it’s still mostly men who are raping and committing violence.” And that’s true, although it’s not nearly as true as people think it is. I just gave three sources indicating that domestic abusers were usually women. European queens also waged more wars than European kings. But yes, violent criminals are usually men.

However, black people also disproportionately commit more crimes. It’s not logical to say “men being violent criminals more often proves that men are bad, but black people being violent criminals more often only proves that they are victims of prejudice and oppression and we should help them.”

It’s also not logical to say “men being violent criminals more often proves that they are bad, but several pieces of research showing women being domestic abusers more often doesn’t say anything about women — it contradicts my current worldview therefore I don’t believe it.”

This whole “women are wonderful and are the victims, men are thrash and are the perpetrators” is just an irrational prejudice. That’s all it is.

Transgender people who transitioned from male to female sometimes say that they feel they “lost their right to be seen as human by transitioning.” So in other words, when people saw them as women they were treated as human, and that ended when people started seeing them as men.

Other female to male transgender people say that they were shocked when suddenly people started treating them as “monsters.”

Female journalist Norah Vincent did an experiment for 18 months where she convincingly disguised herself to look like a man. Later in life, she killed herself.

Next up: women demanded equality. And women have gotten equality.

But equality also means equal responsibilities.

And responsibilities aren’t things that you can just skip if you don’t feel like doing them.

Many women’s implicit position is that they want the benefits of traditional gender roles: getting a special amount of consideration and help and governmental support and women-only celebrations and initiatives, being able to tell men “you go fix it” and “you go fix your own problems”, letting men do the really dirty and dangerous work, being advantaged in divorce and criminal court, being protected, and putting the burden on men to be stoic breadwinners (men who are overly emotional, or who aren’t breadwinners, often aren’t respected by women).

But many women don’t want the responsibilities of traditional gender roles — letting men be the head of the household, letting men be the only ones who vote, and needing to give respect and support to non-criminal men.

Many women also want the benefits of equality (and fair enough): they don’t want to be discriminated against in any way, and they expect men to speak out if there is structural discrimination against them.

But many women refuse the responsibility of equality: they’re not willing to speak out when men are the ones being structurally discriminated against. Even though men can’t speak out: they’re ignored or fired if they say anything.

This isn’t reasonable. You can’t just say “I get to have the benefits of traditional gender roles, but not the responsibilities of traditional gender roles. And I get equality, but men don’t get equality. I want the benefits of equality but not the responsibility that comes with equality.”

Now, the good news here is that even if a woman doesn’t organize protests or starts a podcast or engages in political lobbying, but instead she just takes a little bit of time to privately speak out amongst her friends and family — even that can have a profound effect.

After all, women aren’t evil. Most women — and most men — are just largely unconscious and are simply doing what’s normal and expected.

And if a number of women say that how men are currently being treated isn’t normal, then light and awareness is brought to people, and people have the opportunity to start acting in a conscious way.

A few people speaking the truth can have an outsized effect, because it creates awareness and it stops people from just unconsciously doing the normal, discriminatory thing.

Even if you think of yourself as a normal person, you can have a large positive impact. And no one expects you to fix society all by yourself — all that people expect is that you do your best and that you contribute your piece to the whole. After all, many other good-hearted people are working alongside you.

Even if you don’t yet realize that you can move mountains by yourself — certainly you can move mountains together.

With all my love,

Your star brother,

Hakann

A. S.,

If you want to meet like-minded Earth humans, please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/

If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://channelings.substack.com/p/hakann-onion-healing