Blaming the “ideology of globalism” divides us and distracts us from identifying the corrupt at the top. Credit: betweenhellandhighwater.com/
I feel the need to mention something. I hope I’m right.
In my view, globalism is inevitable. Digital currency is inevitable. Biometrics are probably inevitable. (I don’t know about the last. I’m guessing.)
The point for me is not whether we want them or not, although that is important, but (A) are they safe? and (B) can we trust the people operating them?
A whole country trusted a dictator who gave them concentration camps, disastrous empire building, and, at the last, demanded that the whole of the country be razed to the ground because they’d proven weak and unworthy of glory. We’re watching today, in all our governments, how that kind of dictatorship could arise.
The mainstream media today is cooperating with the dictatorial elements the same way they did in pre-WWII Germany. Meanwhile, our governments are what threaten us at every turn, not what save us.
Our governments in charge of global institutions, digital currency, and biometrics? The same government that floated a toxic vaccine on us, designed to depopulate the globe? That launders money and traffics children, drugs, and weapons? Such a globalist regime I’d oppose.
However, a Global White Hat Military Alliance, cooperating with the galactic federations, the latter of whom follow the Divine Plan? In a time of rising lovelight energies with people at the Trump helm who’ve shown themselves to be reliable and trustworthy? (1) Given that we’ll need to go global, digital, and biometrical at some point anyways, this kind of initiative I can support.
While I oppose the harm the darkness does, I don’t oppose trends that, in the proper hands, can greatly benefit humanity. What we need is honesty and integrity among our leaders and I think the “physics” of the universal laws (2) will see to it that, in the long run as we ascend, we get it.
Apparently, according to Michael, our actions now can set a pattern that will continue:
Archangel Michael: Be very discerning in your judgments and in your condemnations of others. If you continue – and I don’t mean you; I mean the collective – if the pattern of imprisonment continues, of shackling, rather than re-education or redirection, then that is the paradigm that will continue upon this planet. (3)
Moreover, most everything we do here and now will be open to examination and study by other civilizations wanting to know how to carry out the same new form of Ascension which we’ll have pioneered.
Do we really want imprisonment and execution to be part of the legacy we pass along? I don’t have answers in the area of rehabilitation, but I do feel the inner push that says to me that we as a global society need to go there. Globally. (4)
We need to see that the same level of human rights prevails everywhere on Earth. The same general level of prosperity. The same general level of education, health care, transportation, etc. It’s imperative: This world needs to work for everyone now.
Footnotes
(1) I’ve been asked not to name names and I won’t … except for one! J.D. Vance. I’m more and more impressed with him the more I hear him speak.
(2) I refer to Matthew’s discussion:
Earth is nearing vibratory levels where the light is so intense that all who have refused the light – the ones we speak of as dark simply to indicate their lack of light – will die. That may sound unduly harsh, but it is not a matter of some ‘divine’ judgment or punishment – it is simply the physics governing life in this universe that bodies bereft of light cannot survive in those higher vibrations. In short, all those who have been causing fearful conditions will be disappearing. (Matthew’s Message, April 23, 2011.)
(2) In my opinion, it isn’t the machine or procedure we need fear … and sometimes it may be. It’s the character of the people operating, using, or following it or them. To focus on globalism per se, rather than ensuring that corruption is eliminated from our global ranks, would be to leave the core issues unaddressed.
As Michael said:
Archangel Michael: What happens is there is a belief [that] there is a healing, an accommodation, a remedy, and then the human collective tends to think, ‘Okay, now it is cleaned up. Now it is healed. Now it is done.’
But the core – the core issues – of the collective, and of course of the individuals, have not been addressed, and therefore it simply settles in and it festers. (“Archangel Michael on Why All This Conflict is Occurring,” September 28, 2023, at https://goldenageofgaia.com/?p=348361.)
We’ve seen what “settling in” produces, following the Second World War. It produced all of this that we’re now facing: rampant corruption, censorship, open borders, democide, etc.
(3) Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, Mar. 28, 2019.
Robert F. Kennedy: When the Covid vaccines were being rolled out, the mainstream media derided my statements at the time as “misinformation” and “conspiracy theories.”
RFK Jr. predicted that vaccine makers would begin to roll back their promises of vaccine immunity, from 100 to 80 to 70 to 50, etc. In fact Pfizer did that some years ago. Meanwhile, the “magic” vaccine, as Bill Gates called it, promises to take down millions, as it was intended to do. Thanks to Kathleen.
A video on the Geneva Convoy and a selection of articles from Frontline Doctors on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty. Thank you for allowing me to use this event to demonstrate the impact of lethargy on our behavioral choices. Thanks again to Ev.
Del Bigtree’s The Highwire covers the Geneva convoy
Countries at the World Health Assembly in Geneva last week approved new amendments to the International Health Regulations, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced Saturday.
The International Health Regulations (IHR) are a set of international laws that are legally binding on all WHO countries. Claps and cheers reportedly erupted at the World Health Assembly when country delegates agreed to the IHR amendments.
The amendments are the result of two years of negotiations, which began after WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus insisted the IHR be updated in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Here are five key takeaways from the new IHR amendments.
The director-general has unilateral power to declare a ‘pandemic emergency’
Director-General Ghebreyesus may declare public health emergencies and pandemic emergencies at will. He requires no approval from a committee or oversight body.
Once an emergency is declared, it triggers the IHR, which obligate governments to obey the WHO’s rules. These rules require countries to use resources that go towards monitoring and tracking cases, surveillance, research, and developing and distributing “health products” such as masks and vaccines.
Each country must establish a WHO enforcement body
The IHR amendments also require each country to establish a “National IHR Authority,” which is a governmental body tasked with enforcing the WHO’s regulations in that particular country. This is different from the existing requirement to establish a National IHR Focal Point, which is simply a point of contact in each country for WHO officials.
Countries must address ‘misinformation’
Another new addition to the regulations is that governments must develop “risk communication” in a pandemic. This requires “addressing misinformation and disinformation” such as social media posts questioning the safety of vaccines or promoting scientific evidence that challenges conclusions made by public health authorities.
Member countries must pay for ‘equitable access’
WHO member countries must fund the pandemic response in poorer countries, which the IHR refers to as “equity.” The term “equity” or “equitable access” has been added eight times to the amendments, which require governments to:
[I]dentify and enable access to financial resources, including through the Coordinating Financial Mechanism, established pursuant to Article 44bis, necessary to equitably address the needs and priorities of developing countries, including for developing, strengthening and maintaining core capacities.
The WHO will issue mandates concerning ‘health documents’
The WHO will make decisions about how countries issue and authenticate “health documents,” which would seemingly include the international certificate of vaccination mentioned elsewhere in the IHR:
WHO, in consultation with States Parties, shall develop and update, as necessary, technical guidance, including specifications or standards related to the issuance and ascertainment of authenticity of health documents, both in digital format and non-digital format. Such specifications or standards shall be in accordance with Article 45 regarding treatment of personal data.
According to Article 45, governments should not publicize a person’s personal data unless it is necessary for public health.
The WHO has been working on a digital international certificate of vaccination since last year.
In June 2023, the WHO announced the launch of its “digital health partnership” with the European Commission that will involve the development of global vaccine passports among other “digital products to deliver better health for all.”
(2)
WHO pandemic treaty hits snag
Republican governors slam pandemic accord: ‘Unprecedented and unconstitutional powers over the United States and its people’
World Health Organization (WHO) officials have expressed disappointment that negotiations for a “pandemic treaty” have failed to meet a crucial deadline.
‘We are not where we hoped we would be’
For over two years, the WHO has been attempting to introduce a pandemic accord that it claims will “strengthen global pandemic prevention, preparedness and response to prevent a repeat of the health, social and economic impacts that were caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Last week, the WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) held its ninth round of negotiations with member states to compose a final draft of the treaty. The negotiations did not meet expectations, however. WHO officials are disappointed that a final draft was not approved in time for the organization’s annual World Health Assembly in Geneva this week.
“We are not where we hoped we would be when we started this process,” INB Chairman Roland Driece told the Associated Press. Driece added that creating a pandemic treaty is crucial “for the sake of humanity.”
The WHO is also holding negotiations to amend the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR) with which all member states must comply.
24 governors join opposition to pandemic treaty
There has been widespread criticism that the pandemic treaty and IHR amendments will require member states to cede sovereignty to the WHO in the event of a pandemic.
On Wednesday, 24 Republican governors signed a letter to Joe Biden expressing concern that these two initiatives “would purport to grant the World Health Organization (WHO) unprecedented and unconstitutional powers over the United States and its people.”
“The objective of these instruments is to empower the WHO, particularly its uncontrollable Director-General, with the authority to restrict the rights of U.S. citizens, including freedoms such as speech, privacy, travel, choice of medical care, and informed consent, thus violating our Constitution’s core principles,” the governors wrote.
They also expressed concern that the agreements currently under negotiation will transform the WHO from an advisory body to a global health authority. Under the proposed arrangements, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus would have the power to unilaterally declare a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC).
“Furthermore, these instruments would erode sovereignty by granting the WHO’s DirectorGeneral [sic] the authority to dictate responses to a declared PHEIC, stripping elected representatives of their role in setting public health policies and compelling citizens to comply with WHO directives, potentially including mandates regarding medical treatments,” the letter continued.
What does the agreement say?
Indeed, recent drafts of the pandemic treaty would crack down on taxpayers who disobey mandates, among other measures.
In Article 18 of the draft, the WHO clarifies that governments must promote “pandemic literacy” — a strategy which, like media literacy, tells the public who to trust and suppresses “misinformation.”
“The Parties shall strengthen science, public health and pandemic literacy in the population, as well as access to information on pandemics and their effects and drivers, and combat false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation, including through effective international collaboration and cooperation as referred to in Article 16 herein,” the agreement states.
In addition, governments should craft policies that will quash noncompliance with “public health and social measures” and enforce “trust in science and public health institutions.”
“The Parties shall, as appropriate, conduct research and inform policies on factors that hinder adherence to public health and social measures in a pandemic and trust in science and public health institutions,” says the document.
Member states are also instructed to rope in the private sector for pandemic-related activities.
Other provisions in the agreement require governments to take an authoritarian approach to pandemics that go beyond mere regulations and extend to social engineering. In Article 17, for example, governments must not only develop public health policies but also “social policies” aimed at “mobilizing social capital in communities for mutual support.”
A pretense to prescribe global policies?
The WHO would also be able to use public health as a pretext to dictate global policy. In one clause, for example, the WHO demands that governments “encourage ceasefires in affected countries during pandemics to promote global cooperation against common global threats.” In another clause, countries must enforce “gender equality” and place more women in leadership positions to create a proper “health and care workforce.”
Governments would be permitted to withdraw from the pandemic agreement only after waiting two years after signing it, following which the agreement will still remain in effect for that nation for another year as the withdrawal does not take effect immediately.
During that time, the WHO can declare a pandemic at any time and for any reason. Such reasons might include a virus like COVID-19, a social condition like loneliness, or a phenomenon like “climate change.”
(3)
Your personal freedoms are dangerous — to the WHO
‘People having too much freedom is the thing that annoys the regulators’
The failure of the WHO member states to adopt the WHO’s pandemic treaty by the proposed May 27th deadline can be seen as a victory, albeit not final, by freedom-loving persons around the globe.
WHO calls personal decisions dangerous
In September 2019, the WHO ”declared vaccine hesitancy one of the ten biggest threats to global health . . .“ The WHO may actually be threatened by individuals exercising the right to make their own personal health decisions based on their own research.
In August 2020 the WHO credited itself with coining the term “infodemic,” declaring information not coming from the agency to be dangerous misinformation.
Soon after the world started getting used to the terms coronavirus and COVID-19, WHO coined another word: “infodemic” — an overabundance of information and the rapid spread of misleading or fabricated news, images, and videos. Like the virus, it is highly contagious and grows exponentially. It also complicates COVID-19 pandemic response efforts.
“We’re not just battling the virus,” said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “We’re also battling the trolls and conspiracy theorists that push misinformation and undermine the outbreak response.”
A BMJ article, “‘Torrent of fake news’ has put negotiations at risk, says WHO chief,” published January 29, 2024, revealed that WHO Chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a former leader of the Marxist terror group Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), already saw the writing on the wall — that the pandemic treaty was destined to fail. Instead of taking people’s concerns to heart, however, he chose to blame the troubles on “fake news.”
WHO officials blamed conspiracy theories for mobilising public opposition to the accord and hindering negotiations. Social media is awash with what Tedros described as a “a torrent of fake news, lies, and conspiracy theories.”
Among the false claims are that the pandemic treaty plans to snatch sovereignty from countries by imposing lockdowns or vaccine mandates. “This is fake news, lies, and conspiracy theories. Negotiating members know that the agreement will give WHO no such powers, because you are writing it,” Tedros said.
Despite Tedros protestations, “fake news” is not the reason the pandemic treaty is now on life support.
Power grab
Censorship
National Herald India‘s AJ Prabal described what appears to be the main reason politicians throughout the world have resisted ratifying the treaty – they’re apparently unwilling to cede their own powers to the world body. He documents the breadth of power the unelected and unaccountable body holds to censor scientists and what it deems “disinformation:”[1]
Once the countries sign the treaty, they will hand over all regulatory control of future pandemics (Disease X) to WHO. The UN body will declare the onset of fresh pandemics, declare protocols to be followed (lockdowns, vaccines), prescribe medicines and their dosage, demand surveillance prescribed by it, and decide on which medicines and vaccines are acceptable and which are not. What is more, WHO will also have the power to censor scientific papers, scientists, and research, and also decide what is disinformation and what is not.
WHO is an unelected body and is totally unaccountable to anyone, [Dutch politician and European Parliament independent member Robert ‘Rob’] Ruse has pointed out. But WHO nevertheless wants countries to cede part of their sovereignty so that WHO, despite its poor record, can control future pandemics, bio-terrorism and climate change. (Emphases added.)
Not a good fit for most
Ruse also explained that solutions cannot be one-size-fits-all. Different countries have different needs as demographics and health concerns vary.
Ruse has also pointed out that one size does not fit all. [Pune-based epidemiologist] Dr Banerjee agrees. Demographics differ from country to country as do conditions, he points out. India is a young country with an overwhelming percentage of its population below the age of 70, whereas Europe is ageing faster. Obesity and comorbidities are major health issues in the West but not so much in Asia. In Africa, mortality from Covid was higher in South Africa, where people are more obese than in other countries. While obesity is a problem in the West, malnutrition is a more serious problem in poorer countries like India. (Emphaisis added.)
Ignores local health concerns
Focusing on pandemic solutions rather than local health needs can lead to misapplied resources and bad outcomes. This is what happened in India where TB and dengue are more serious diseases than COVID was.
Not just demography, but population density and cultural differences too can play a role in pandemics. In India, 80 per cent of the population did not take a booster dose. They did not have to. More Indians died of other diseases than of Covid-19, and yet the government spent 50 per cent of the total health budget on securing vaccines to deal with Covid. Neglect of other diseases has led to a resurgence in cases of TB and dengue, and about 2,000 children in India continue to die every day of diseases other than Covid, Dr Banerjee points out. (Emphases added.)
Your personal health takes a backseat to “public health”
Former British comedian and actor, Russel Brand may be one of those who Ghebreyesus believes is spreading lies. Now a podcaster with some conservative views, Brand has not hesitated to express his perspective on the events of our times.
In a May 2022 podcast, a week before a gathering of the WHO’s World Health Assembly, the WHO‘s governing body, to work on the treaty, Brand elaborated on the agency’s interest in increasing its regulatory powers while quoting from a Telegraph article on the treaty draft. It is funded, Brand pointed out, primarily by nations and organizations with “biases at odds” with your and his health requirements and his preference for more freedom, not less:
Lifesite News journalist Stephen Kokx reported on an interview Brand had with Tucker Carlson, during which they discussed several topics, including Brand’s experience of having been targeted by the CIA and the UK government for his viewpoints — they had tried to destroy his reputation with vague sexual allegations — and Brand’s views of the globalists’ attempts to suppress dissent:[2]
“There are now sets of globalist organizations, funded by government, but also by corporations, that are making deliberate, profound attempts to shut down any dissent in an astonishingly aggressive way,” he said.
. . .
“It’s like we’re being prepped, groomed, primed for ‘war is coming.’ We’re being kept in a state of constant anxiety in order to induce compliance,” he asserted. “The ongoing stoking of cultural tension is to ensure that people don’t begin to recognize that actually we have far more in common with one another than we do with these curious sets of establishment interests that seem to be transcendent of national democracy. To be explicit, I’m talking about organizations like the WHO, NATO, the WEF, and their astonishing influence.” (Emphases added.)
They also discussed geopolitics and the globalists’ doublespeak to cloak their intentions. Kokx reported:
Brand and Carlson agreed that the “loathing of nature” carried out by global elites indicates “something dark” is happening.
“Clearly what we’re watching are the fruits of spiritual war,” Carlson stated. “Certainly the solution seems to me to be spiritual,” Brand replied, adding that “authoritarianism now is being deliberately veiled in the insidious language of care, concern, safety and convenience.” (Emphasis added.)
Trust them not to take away your freedom?
Authoritarianism vs freedom was a topic of grave concern for Sky News Australia’s Outsider program cohosts Rowan Dean, Rita Panahi, and James Morrow, as well. In a discussion about the global pandemic treaty,”[3] they voiced concern about the proposed treaty and how it may be well received in Australia, particularly as most of the people accepted and even cheered on COVID-19 countermeasures. They also expressed concern about the dire implications the treaty has for personal freedoms, pointing out that the regulators, who may not be willing to endure people’s personal freedom, claim that freedom is the problem:
Dean:
The reality is the World Health Organization have [sic] made it crystal clear James that they want that ability to have a global pandemic treaty.
Morrow:
Well you know, and thing here that underlies this and so many things that we need to be vigilant about and what people need to be vigilant about but they get called conspiracy theorists and whack jobs and things like that, the fundamental idea behind all of this is this idea that freedom is somehow the problem.
And this is the issue, with so many of the issues that we face, whether it’s the pandemic whether it’s the climate crisis, if you want to say that in quotes, whatever the issue is, people having too much freedom is the thing that annoys the regulators and we’re going to see this. We saw the Climate Council this week come out and say that well to, you know, fight the climate thing not only do we need to all move to EVS but we need to own half as many cars and take half as many car trips we need to take trips according to the public transport schedule.
You know, we see this on level after level after level and this is what people need to be really vigilant about. It is not freedom that is the problem. It is always the people who want to take your freedom away.
Dean:
And we’re now in a world where really it’s not left versus right — it’s authoritarianism versus freedom, as James says — or the collective, the greater good versus freedom of the individual to make their own choices. And what we saw during COVID, which is why we must have a royal commission, as Rita was saying, to find out what actually happened during COVID. You must have that Royal Commission into what actually happened and what did happen to our freedoms and at what costs they came. (Emphases added.)
Considering the above, it appears that it is the WHO’s agenda that presents a danger — to your personal freedom.
Over the years, the true plot was buried in all sorts of deceptive narratives ranging from "climate change" and holes in the ozone layer to simple messaging that people are having "too many" babies for the planet to handle. In all of the narratives, the true underlying goal was always the same: mass depopulation.
One of the latest more-explicit calls for genocide came from Dennis Meadows of the globalist-led Club of Rome, who stated in no uncertain terms what the globalist plan for the world entails:
"We want to have freedom and we want to have high standards, so we're going to have a billion people. We're now at seven, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow – relatively slow – and can be done in a way that is relatively equal."
In other words, "we," meaning the top 0.1 percent of the world's upper crust, want to live in a world without all of the rest of us "useless eaters." Such a world would have very "high standards," as opposed to today's low standards with so many extra people, so something has to change, in Meadows' view.
Not only did Meadows not beat around the bush concerning his intentions with the above statement, he also threw out some precise numerals illustrating just how many people have to go in order for he and the rest of the globalists to achieve their long-awaited paradise on earth.
"He wants the global population to go from 7 billion to 1 billion!" writes Daniel Bobinski on his "Keep the Republic" Substack. "He wants 6 billion people to disappear – equally. He also said he wants it to happen 'peacefully,' as in, 'without violence' ... Now, how might that happen?"
(Related: Canada, which has some of the world's most liberal euthanasia laws, now allows for the killing of infants and babies through its euthanasia program.)
Ready for the soft kill
Back in 2010, Mark Notaras and Darek Gondor of United Nations University (UNU) wrote a piece about Meadows explaining his plans to limit population growth in order to "save the world."
Meadows, a professor and co-author of "The Limits to Growth," made statements back then about how mass depopulation is the only way to ensure that the planet will remain inhabitable moving into the future.
"If the present trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next 100 years," Meadows said at the time.
"Today, we are at a point in human history where habits that once worked well don't work anymore."
It has been nearly 14 years since Meadows was quoted by these two UNU writers as having made such statements, and even back then they said it "sounds reasonable" compared to how it would have sounded back in, say, 1972.
In 2010, much of the West had already been indoctrinated into climate cultism as the "final solution" to the problem of human industrial activity, which is supposedly "melting" the planet – or in today's vernacular, boiling the oceans. His solution? Kill off billions of people, albeit slowly and peacefully, i.e., through euthanasia.
A computer model developed by Meadows and several of his colleagues argues that the critical line for earth's human carrying capacity was exceeded back around 1980. Since that time, planetary conditions have degraded to the point that even more severe intervention is needed to fix things.
Mass depopulation is how the globalists intend to complete their endgame, allowing them to inherit the world through murder and force. Find out more at Genocide.news.
The number of unexpected or excess deaths in the first nine months of 2023 is about 158,000 higher than the same period in 2019 and has even surpassed the combined losses from every conflict since the Vietnam War.
A report by the Society of Actuaries (SOA) disclosed this concerning find. The SOA’s report, which is used by insurance companies to inform their decisions, found that the excess deaths are disproportionately affecting young, working-age individuals.
Mortality rates among the insured group aged 25 to 34 saw a 19 percent increase in deaths, while the insured group aged 35 to 44 saw a 26 percent increase in deaths. Surprisingly, the mortality rate among insured individuals aged 65 and older were six percent below the pre-pandemic norm.
Moreover, life insurance companies reported that death claims surged by 15.4 percent to $90 billion in 2020 – the largest one-year leap since the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic. While claims slowed down in 2022, they still exceeded 2019 levels.
Given this data, actuaries and industry analysts predict that more younger people with life insurance will continue to die unexpectedly until 2030. This prediction goes against what is normally expected to happen for a healthy group of individuals with life insurance. As a result, insurance experts advocate for the adaptation of early-warning programs to detect potential health issues among those with life insurance policies. (Related: Life insurance companies sound DEATH ALERT warnings over nearly 100,000 excess deaths per month happening right now in the USA.)
COVID-19 vaccines have something to do with decline in life expectancy
Writing for the New American, Selwyn Duke mentioned the series of alarming posts from Dr. Robert Califf, commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Califf’s posts on X in December of last year said that while the government overlooks the major decline in life expectancy among young, working-age people, he believes it is a cause for concern.
“We are facing extraordinary headwinds in our public health with a major decline in life expectancy. The major decline in the U.S. is not just a trend. I’d describe it as catastrophic,” he wrote.
The FDA head also mentioned a recent report from JAMA International Medicine conducted this December revealed that the average life expectancy in the U.S. has fallen to 76 years, with male life expectancy dropping even lower to 73 years.
An X user replied to Califf’s post, linking the decline in life expectancy to the COVID-19 vaccine and citing a study to support her argument. The said study highlighted an increase in cancer rates among Britons that coincided with the rollout of the injections:
Fatal breast cancer rates among women rose by 28 percent
Pancreatic cancer deaths increased by 80 percent among women and 60 percent among men
Colon cancer deaths increased by 55 percent among men and 41 percent among women
Fatal melanomas saw a 120 percent increase among men and a 35 percent increase among women
Brain cancer deaths increased by 35 percent among men and 12 percent among women
Cancer deaths “without site specification” rose by 60 percent among men and 55 percent among women
The X user highlighted the fact that COVID-19 vaccines are contaminated with simian virus 40, which is highly linked to cancer. They also asked Califf if the FDA is going to recall the injections, given this contamination. “I further hope the FDA is looking into T-cell exhaustion following vaccination, which could explain why so many people are getting turbo cancer now,” the user concluded.
My New Year’s Wish is That the World Awakens – Quickly and Safely
BySteve Beckow
Posted on December 30, 2023
Christmas in WW1, depicted. (1) We’re getting there. Credit: welt.de
I seem to become reflective at this time of year. Holidays at some point take over and the part of the world that celebrates usually falls … well, silent.
Not this year.
This year we’re at war. Underground, hidden until Lahaina, now open.
We haven’t reached the public turning point. We have behind the scenes, yes, but not on your Nightly News … yet.
In the war we’re in, if the deep state had its way, it’d see all but 500 million of us die from their depopulation weapons such as toxic vaccines, weather warfare, chemtrails, 5G, food destruction, even nuclear warfare, etc.
It’s true that the ending of this war is already written. The Divine Mother, the active face of Mother/Father One, assures us:
Divine Mother: [I am speaking about] those in … positions where control and abuse of power have been rampant. That will not be the platform [from] which integration of the various galaxies [into the new region of space] takes place. That is not the Plan.
I know very clearly, sweet one, as do you, if it is not [in] my Plan, then it will not occur. (2)
Thus a victory for darkness on Earth, which you could say Atlantis and Lemuria were, in a twisted fashion, will not occur. Period.
That’s an article of faith with me, a foundational principle.
But that’s not all that’s at stake here. Children are being trafficked underground, used sexually, tortured for adrenochrome, and murdered. We need to keep this always in mind and free the children. (3)
To avoid a global civil war and mass casualties, and to wake people up, the white hats are letting team dark play out their hand. Clones and masked actors among world leaders are playing out the deep-state’s playbook but under white-hat control.
***
As we speak, behind the scenes, team dark are being starved of funds and brought before tribunals. We’re going to be shocked at who has gone.
Let me say that anyone using adrenochrome (Hollywood, Washington, state governments) may be in big trouble (this is just my guess). I’d imagine its use falls under crimes against humanity.
How long it’s taking for the sleeping public to wake up appears to reflect the hold the corrupt and complicit mainstream media have over us.
Those leaders still free are jumping back and forth, from issue to issue – Ukraine/Russia, Israel/Gaza, climate change, pandemics, transhumanism, AI, etc. Anyone remember Nord Stream? Oh, and athletes dying on-screen? No? We forget within weeks.
And to date it’s worked to keep a large section of the populace unaware of what’s really happening, confused, and apathetic.
***
Unless we see it being acted out right in front of our eyes, or hear a confession, we might never believe what’s happening. Satanists? Child-killers? Organ harvesters? Cannibals?
Ah c’mon, Mack. You’re a conspiracy theorist.
Yah, but it’s real.
Our children are disappearing into their clutches.
Remember the milk-carton kids? Our refusal to wake up sees people die, victims of the deep state’s greed, lust, and Satanism.
My New Year’s wish is that the world wakes up – sooner than “soon” – quickly and safely – to the terrible peril we’re in from the elites of the world gathered together as the secret societies, New World Order, Illuminati, cabal, or deep state.
They may not win the war, but who wants another child to fall victim to them?
This must be both the highest evolutionary and lowest devolutionary point human civilization has ever reached. One part of it is actively trying to murder all but a small servile remainder and the other part is fighting to save humanity.
And we must save ourselves, with some, limited help from our star family, because we got ourselves into this fix in the first place. The Law of Karma applies. (4)
Unless we wake up to the fact that this is actually happening in our world, its harmfulness will continue. For a time. We want to speed the inevitable rise of the divine independence of the people of Earth and reduce the impact of the leaving of the darkness. (5)
Footnotes
(1) But notice the ethnocentricity: Our side (the Brit) confidently extends his hand, venturing forth, while their side (the German) timorously extends his in response. Yes, we are the good guys in our own history.
(4) SaLuSa: War is one of [the dark’s] greatest weapons and even now they fuel the ones occurring in the Middle East. They must stop very soon, but some karma is being played out and must run its course. It is sad and we hear the cries of those in pain, but we are unable to interfere in what is your affair and the result of your actions. We do not wish to sound harsh but we are bound by Galactic Law, which we fully understand and abide by. (SaLuSa, June 22, 2011.)
The galactics are still busy, even if we must do our share:
Archangel Michael: Because you are not cognizant of the overrides, nor do you need to be, because you don’t see them as yet, you will soon, you think that we are doing nothing. We have prevented nuclear devastation. We have prevented global disintegration. We have prevented wars and mayhem. We have prevented tidal waves. We have prevented or softened earthquakes.
We have prevented or shifted human interest and beliefs, not overriding free choice but exposing billions, all at once, to accept a new idea. And you are seeing that. You are seeing it in the acceptance of humanity of your star brothers and sisters, of the angelic realm, of star technology that is in the homes of every person pretty much.
