Alien-Human Hybrid Program to Create Galaxy-Communicating Race

Alien-Human Hybrid Program to Create Galaxy-Communicating Race

By Vicky Verma 

Post on 2026/04/16

Former U.S. Congressman Matt Gaetz claims a man in a U.S. Army uniform once visited his office and described a secret program in which aliens were bred with kidnapped humans to create a galaxy-communicating hybrid race.

In an interview with Benny Johnson, Matt Gaetz said that a man in a U.S. Army uniform once came to his office in Crestview, Florida, and gave a strange briefing in a non-classified setting with his staff present. This man claimed there was a very secret military program where living aliens were forced to breed with kidnapped humans from war zones and migrant caravans to create a hybrid race that could communicate across galaxies.

The whistleblower said there were about six to twelve locations in the United States where this was happening and asked for multiple members of Congress to visit all sites at the same time so the evidence could not be moved, which Gaetz says was physically impossible, so it never happened. Gaetz clearly says he never checked or verified any of this and that there were questions about whether the whistleblower was mentally stable; his own lawyer suggested it might just be a military person who “lost his mind” and made a PowerPoint.

He then connects this to David Grusch’s testimony in Congress about “non-human biologics,” saying Grusch told the House Oversight Committee that in some recovered crashed craft, the CIA and a special crash-recovery program found not only materials but also biological matter that could not be linked to humans.

David Grusch said that when he worked in U.S. intelligence, he was told about a long-running secret program that recovered crashed UFOs and tried to reverse engineer their technology. He explained that this program went on for many decades and that he learned about it in his official duties, even though he was personally blocked from full access to it. He said he and trusted colleagues with special clearances interviewed around 40 people, including senior officials, and checked their claims using documents, reports, and cross-checking with other sources. After this, he became convinced that the program was real and that the U.S. government had multiple craft of non-human origin.

When he spoke about “non-human biologics,” he said that with some of these crash recoveries, there were biological remains connected to the craft. In his congressional testimony, he stated that “biologics came with some of these recoveries,” and when a member of Congress asked him if these were human or non-human, he answered that they were non-human. He said this was not just his guess, but the assessment of people who had direct knowledge of the secret program and were still working inside it. At the same time, he admitted he had not personally seen alien bodies himself, and that his statements were based on what these insiders told him.

Grusch also said there had been “various retrievals” and suggested there were different kinds of biological remains, which hinted at more than one type of entity. He said there seemed to be a variety of beings, but no one fully understood their biology, and he described this as a major challenge for scientists who studied the material. He mentioned that some people used the word “extraterrestrial,” but he preferred broader terms like “non-human intelligence” because the origin might be more complex, possibly involving other dimensions or realities.

Gaetz said he had personally not visited any secret bases or UFO crash sites, and that the hybrid-breeding story had been one of the strangest briefings he had ever received.

Gaetz explained that in classified briefings, he had seen radar sequences showing several craft moving in formation, merging into a single object, then splitting back into many craft again, repeatedly. He said this kind of behavior had not been possible with any technology the United States or its adversaries then had. When he later watched a public video of a drone strike where an object broke into pieces and then reformed, he was not surprised because it looked similar to what he had seen on classified radar, except that what he had seen involved multiple objects flying in a clear, controlled formation before merging and separating again.

He said that if the classified footage he had seen had been declassified, the main public question would have been how such technology existed, and if the U.S. had not had it and had not thought any other country had it, then where it came from. He described it as “space age” technology that had not looked like anything on Earth. Gaetz said he had had higher-than-normal access as a member of the Armed Services Committee for eight years, on the emerging threats subcommittee, with special clearances above a standard congressional briefing, including visibility into DARPA and advanced military projects.

He said he had seen things in classified settings that had not been explained by the technology the U.S. had then known it possessed, and he had felt well informed about existing weapons and systems, so these anomalies had stood out. He mentioned that scientists connected to UFO work had kept “disappearing” and joked that on LinkedIn, it might have been more dangerous to be known as a UFO scientist than even as a general in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.

On whether the U.S. had been using alien technology, Gaetz said he had believed the American military had benefited from acquiring unknown technology and reverse engineering it, but he had not claimed to know for sure that it had been alien or from outer space. He talked about reports that the U.S. had handed unusual technology to defense contractor Lockheed Martin to try to copy things like plasma propulsion and stealth capabilities.

For him, this had fit with how deeply defense contractors and the military had been connected, and he had thought such advanced projects might have existed as much in the contractor world as inside the official military. He ended by saying he had only known that this technology had not seemed to come from within the normal U.S. defense system, even if he had not been able to prove it had been from aliens.

There is a bizarre story of a Florida man named Eddie Page, born Tommy Coleman Jr., who claimed he was a human–alien hybrid whose father was from the Pleiadian star system. He grew up with strange experiences and, after joining the US Marines in 1972, was sent on a secret mission to Vietnam, where an attack happened, he blacked out, and later woke up in a rice field more than 500 miles away, with 11 days missing from his memory. He was detained and examined for months by doctors, and he said his military medical file showed abnormal organs, unusual blood, and a note saying “Not of Human Origin.”

Years later, after his first wife and newborn child mysteriously disappeared from the hospital, he used regressive hypnosis and “remembered” that he had been killed in the ambush but rescued by Pleiadian aliens, healed in a liquid on their craft, and told telepathically by a small being, “No son of mine will be killed.” He said he was part of a joint US government–Pleiadian hybrid program, that he was one of 32 cloned hybrids (21 female, 11 male) with only 8 still alive, and that secret agents watched him afterwards. He also claimed to have medical records proving his non‑human origin and promoted his story through websites and his book “Project Aquarius.”

Dr. Karla Turner also said that the so‑called alien “hybrid program” was only one part of a much darker agenda, and that abductions involved far more than just making mixed alien‑human babies. From her research and her own family’s experiences, she said abductees reported implants, surgeries, pain experiments, cloning, mind control, and even interest in the human soul, which went way beyond simple breeding.

She argued that aliens controlled human perception, memories, emotions, and even spiritual experiences, often hiding what really happened behind fake, “beautiful” scenes or screen memories. She said this manipulation allowed them to trick people into believing comforting stories, like a loving hybrid program, while hiding cruel medical procedures, sexual abuse, and psychological programming.

Turner believed some aliens lied and used propaganda, mixing truth with lies to gain trust, and she warned that many promises and predictions from these beings never came true. She said abductees’ memories could not be taken at face value, because they usually described what the aliens wanted them to remember, not the real events, and she stressed that the agenda seemed physical, psychological, and spiritual altogether, not just about creating hybrids.

She also said human military forces sometimes took part in abductions and harassment, which made her think there was cooperation between aliens and parts of the military. Overall, she saw the hybrid‑baby story as too small to explain everything she documented and thought it might even be a cover to hide a deeper program that targeted bodies, minds, beliefs, and souls.

Vicky Verma

• Source

Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from: 

• https://eraoflight.com/2026/04/15/former-us-congressman-claims-man-in-uniform-revealed-secret-alien-human-hybrid-program-to-create-galaxy-communicating-race/

Ex-NASA Scientist Claims: “Consciousness Is Fundamental — Our Reality Is a Simulation”

Ex-NASA Scientist Claims: “Consciousness Is Fundamental — Our Reality Is a Simulation”

By Vicky Verma

Posted on June 21, 2025

This Man, who worked for NASA, has devised several experiments to prove that our reality is a simulation. He says, ‘Consciousness is not a product of the simulation — it is fundamental to reality.’

Thomas Campbell is a physicist, author, and speaker. He’s best known for writing a book series called My Big T.O.E. — where “T.O.E.” stands for Theory of Everything. In this series, he tries to explain how everything in the universe works, from physics to consciousness.

His big idea is that reality might be like a computer simulation — like a super advanced video game. He believes the universe started with a “digital Big Bang” and that everything we experience is part of a virtual world. This idea connects to something called digital physics, which suggests that the universe runs on information, like a computer program.

Campbell also worked with other scientists to design experiments that could test whether we’re living in a simulation. In 2018, he even ran a successful Kickstarter campaign that raised over $236,000 to fund those experiments.

Thomas Campbell worked for NASA as part of the Ares I program, which was a project aimed at developing a rocket to replace the Space Shuttle and send astronauts to space, including missions to the Moon and Mars. His role focused on risk assessment and solving technical problems to ensure mission and crew safety.

Specifically, he worked on identifying and addressing vulnerabilities — basically figuring out what could go wrong and finding ways to prevent failures. His job was to improve the chances of success for both the rocket and the astronauts on board.

Before that, he had had a long career in defense technology. He had been working as a systems analyst for U.S. Army technical intelligence for 10 years, then spent 30 more years working on missile defense systems as a contractor for the Department of Defense.

So while he’s now known for his work on consciousness and simulation theory, his background is rooted in physics and high-stakes engineering — particularly making sure complex systems (like rockets) don’t fail under extreme conditions.

Thomas Campbell’s theory, “My Big TOE” (TOE stands for Theory of Everything), isn’t just a scientific idea — he presents it as a paradigm shift, meaning it completely changes how we understand reality.

He argues that consciousness, not matter, is the true foundation of existence. In other words, the physical world we experience isn’t what’s ultimately real — instead, it’s consciousness that creates reality, and everything else (matter, space, time) is secondary.

According to Campbell, our universe works like a virtual reality, designed to give each of us “individuated units of consciousness” — a structured, rule-based environment to learn, grow, and evolve.

Essentially, he suggests that life is less about physical survival and more about developing our consciousness, almost like players in a complex, immersive game where the goal is to become better, more evolved beings.

Campbell is working to prove that we live in a computer simulation — like a highly advanced video game. He designed five experiments to test whether our reality is being “rendered” only when observed, similar to how video games load graphics as you play. His goal is to find scientific evidence that our universe isn’t physical in the way we assume, but instead a virtual reality created by some larger system.

Campbell and his colleagues have proposed several experiments to test the simulation hypothesis. While the specific names of these experiments are not widely publicized, their designs are detailed in the 2017 paper “On Testing the Simulation Theory.” (Source)

These experiments primarily involve variations of quantum mechanics experiments, such as the double-slit experiment and delayed-choice quantum eraser setups, aiming to detect anomalies that could suggest our reality operates as a simulation

His experiments aim to test this idea by studying strange behaviors in quantum physics — particularly the double-slit experiment and quantum eraser setups. These experiments already show that particles behave differently when they’re observed. Campbell wants to take this further and see whether reality only forms when a conscious observer is present.

The goal of his experiments is to figure out if reality reacts to observation, which would support the idea that we live in a simulation-like reality. Each experiment is meant to untangle the relationship between consciousness and the physical world, suggesting that our minds might play a much bigger role in shaping reality than science currently accepts.

Campbell also founded a non-profit group, Center for the Unification of Science and Consciousness (CUSAC), to fund these experiments. He argues that consciousness isn’t part of the simulation — it’s actually the foundation of reality. In his view, we’re not bodies inside a universe — we’re consciousness experiencing a digital-like reality. (Source)

Even if his experiments succeed, though, Campbell acknowledges that they probably won’t give absolute proof that we live in a simulation. Instead, they might shift how we understand reality — possibly showing that the universe behaves more like a participatory experience than a fixed, independent world.

Vicky Verma

• https://howandwhys.com/ex-nasa-scientist-claims-consciousness-is-fundamental-our-reality-is-a-simulation/

 

This Man Found In Brain Simulation Study That Hints Human Have Psychic Powers

This Man Found In Brain Simulation Study That Hints Human Have Psychic Powers

By Vicky Verma

Posted on May 30, 2025

This Man found that the brain might block or filter out psi (psychic or extrasensory abilities). He and his team of researchers have uncovered evidence suggesting that the human mind may possess latent abilities to influence seemingly random events—abilities typically suppressed by the brain itself.

Dr. Morris Freedman, Head of Neurology at Baycrest and Professor of Neurology at the University of Toronto, along with Malcolm A. Binns, Jed A. Meltzer, Rohila Hashimi, and Robert Chen, authored a research paper titled “Enhanced Mind-Matter Interactions Following rTMS-Induced Frontal Lobe Inhibition” in 2023.

In this study, they tested healthy people by using a technique called rTMS, which temporarily weakens or shuts down a small area of the brain. When they used rTMS on the left middle frontal area, they saw a noticeable increase in psi-related effects, just like they had predicted. They analyzed the results to match their main theory and found clear evidence to support it.

Their earlier research on people with brain damage in the frontal lobe showed that a specific part of the brain, the left middle frontal area, might be involved in this blocking.

This suggests that the brain may normally stop psi from happening, and when that blocking area is weakened, either by injury or temporarily through rTMS, psi effects become easier to detect.

One big reason people don’t accept psychic abilities is that the effects are usually very small and hard to repeat in experiments.

Psi is a group of mysterious mental abilities like telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, and psychokinesis. While some researchers have found evidence supporting these abilities, others argue that the effects are too small or too hard to prove in scientific tests.

There are also no solid scientific theories explaining how psi might work. Still, if these abilities are real, they could be very important, so scientists believe more well-designed studies are needed to understand them better.

One theory suggests that the human brain may block these psi abilities. If psi were real and useful, evolution should have made them stronger over time.

But since that hasn’t happened, it’s possible that the brain evolved to suppress them. This may have helped people survive by stopping distractions from overwhelming psychic information, like random thoughts or future visions.

The idea goes back to the philosopher Henri Bergson, who suggested over 100 years ago thatthe nervous system may have evolved to inhibit psi as a protective mechanism to screen individuals from stimuli that are of no interest or benefit to them.

Based on this idea, the researchers created a model suggesting that the frontal lobes of the brain, especially a part called the left medial middle frontal area, may act as a filter to block psi abilities.

They found support for this in two patients with brain damage in that exact area. Both patients showed unusual ability to mentally affect a computer-generated arrow on a screen—something called micro-psychokinesis, or micro-PK—which means , nfluencing small random events with the mind.

To test their theory more broadly, Dr. Morris Freedman and other researchers used a non-invasive technique called repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on healthy volunteers.

rTMS can temporarily “turn off” parts of the brain.

They used it to simulate brain damage in the same area linked to psi filtering in their earlier patients. They then asked these volunteers to try to mentally influence the direction of a computer arrow controlled by a Random Event Generator (REG). They hypothesized that people with this temporary brain disruption would show more ability to influence the arrow than those without it.

In total, they studied 108 healthy people using this method. Their goal was to see if disrupting the brain’s “psi filter” would allow hidden mental abilities to show up, supporting the idea that psi might be real but usually suppressed by the brain.

How did they conduct the study?

The researchers recruited 108 healthy adults from a participant database at the Rotman Research Institute. They made sure no one in the study had brain-related disorders, serious mental health issues, or had experienced major depression recently.

People with past psychosis, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, or obsessive-compulsive disorder were also excluded. Participants also had to pass a standard screening to make sure they were safe candidates for transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which is the brain stimulation technique used in the study.

To prevent participants from guessing whether they were receiving real or fake (sham) brain stimulation, anyone who had experienced rTMS before was not allowed to take part.

Everyone was randomly assigned to one of three groups: one group received rTMS to the left frontal brain area, another to the right frontal area, and the third group received a sham treatment that mimicked rTMS but didn’t affect the brain.

Each group had 36 people, and each person completed a large number of mental influence tasks (500 where they tried to influence the outcome and 500 where they didn’t).

Participants were also evenly divided in terms of the order in which they performed the tasks (some started with tasks trying to move an arrow left, others right). The researchers carefully planned the group assignments to make sure the results would be reliable and could show even small differences between the real and sham stimulation groups.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)

In this part of the study, researchers used a special machine to send magnetic pulses to specific parts of the brain. This technique is called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and it can temporarily reduce activity in the brain area it’s aimed at—almost like turning that part of the brain off for a short time.

They used it on two spots: the left and right frontal areas of the brain. Some people got real brain stimulation, and others got sham stimulation, which looked and sounded the same but didn’t affect the brain. This helped the researchers compare real effects with fake ones.

Each person got the stimulation in the same way, and everything was carefully controlled, so the only difference between groups was whether they got real or sham stimulation. The goal was to see if turning off a specific brain area would allow psi to show up.

Result!

In this study, researchers wanted to see if people could influence a computer with their mind, like making an arrow on a screen move just by thinking about it. They believed that a part of the brain might usually block this ability, so they used a safe method to temporarily “turn off” that brain area in some people.

They divided people into three groups: one had the left side of that brain area turned off, another had the right side turned off, and the last group got a fake version of the treatment (so they wouldn’t know if they were being treated or not).

The task was to try to mentally push the arrow on the screen to the left or right. Everyone did hundreds of trials, and the researchers watched to see if any group did better than the others at influencing the arrow.

At first, the results weren’t clear. But when they focused on the early part of the experiment, when the brain “turning off” was likely strongest, they saw something interesting: the group with the left side of their brain affected seemed to be better at mentally pushing the arrow to the right. This didn’t happen in the other groups.

This suggests that when that specific brain area is not working normally, people might be better able to use some kind of psychic ability to affect things outside their body. The results support the idea that the brain might usually block these abilities, and when the block is lifted, they can show up more easily.

Dr. Steve Taylor, a psychologist and author of 16 books on psychology and spirituality, says, “I’m willing to accept the possibility of psychic phenomena such as telepathy and precognition.” (Source)

Vicky Verma

• https://howandwhys.com/rupert-sheldrake-morphic-resonance/

 

The Scientist Who Says Nature Has Memory and Minds Aren’t Trapped in Brains

The Scientist Who Says Nature Has Memory and Minds Aren’t Trapped in Brains

By Vicky Verma

Posted on May 23, 2025

The CIA trains people not to look directly at the people they are following, as otherwise they can ‘sense’ they are being stared at and turn around. This Man argues that this is due to consciousness being extended outside of the brain.

Rupert Sheldrake is a biologist who has written over 100 scientific papers and 9 books, and has helped write 6 more. His books have been translated into 28 languages. In 2013, a top think tank in Switzerland named him one of the world’s 100 most important thinkers. On ResearchGate, a popular site for scientists, he ranks in the top 4% for research interest.

On Google Scholar, his work has been cited many times, giving him high academic scores. For twelve years in a row, Watkins magazine has listed him as one of the most spiritually influential living people.

His work has appeared in many well-known magazines and newspapers, and he has been featured on BBC radio and TV.

In the interview, philosopher Hilary Lawson asks Rupert Sheldrake why the scientific community has been so critical of his work, even though he has been very successful with the general public. Sheldrake explains that the scientific community is not just one group—it’s made up of many different people with different opinions.

When he first shared his ideas, some scientists were interested and friendly, while others were more skeptical. He had especially good experiences with scientists in India, who were open to his ideas, like morphic resonance.

But things changed after he published his first book, A New Science of Life, in 1981. A powerful editor at the science journal Nature, Sir John Maddox, harshly criticized the book and even said it was “a book for burning.” This public attack made Sheldrake seem like an outsider or a heretic in the eyes of many scientists, which made others afraid to openly support him.

Sheldrake believes that the scientists who attack him most often are militant atheists. He explains that these people treat materialist science almost like a religion, and because his work challenges their worldview, they react very strongly. This kind of criticism also appears on platforms like Wikipedia, where a group called “guerrilla skeptics” has taken control of his biography and prevents others from changing it.

However, Sheldrake also says that most scientists are not so extreme. When he gives talks at scientific institutions, people often come up to him privately afterward and say they’re very interested in his work and have had similar experiences, like feeling telepathic connections or sensing when their dog knows they’re coming home. But they admit they’re afraid to speak up about it because they don’t want to be judged or attacked by their peers. Sheldrake tells them that they’re not alone, and many of their colleagues feel the same way in secret.

Sheldrake agrees that he does have a philosophical view. His worldview is holistic: he believes that consciousness exists throughout the universe, that minds extend beyond just the brain, and that nature has a kind of memory—what he calls “morphic resonance.” These ideas go against the usual materialist and mechanistic view of science, which sees everything as just matter and machines. But Sheldrake says the key difference is that he thinks all of these views—including his own—should be openly discussed and tested scientifically. He does experiments to test his theories.

He says the people who oppose him don’t want open discussion. Instead, they label anything that doesn’t fit their materialist worldview as “pseudoscience” and try to cancel or suppress it. He calls this an unfair, one-sided situation.

Sheldrake points out that in most areas of life, like philosophy, politics, or religion, there are many different points of view, and people accept that. But in science, he says, there’s no real culture of open debate about controversial ideas. Instead, the dominant view controls everything: funding, journals, jobs, peer review, and government science advice. Those who don’t agree with the mainstream often get pushed out and silenced.

Sheldrake sees his ideas as models, not as the final truth. Morphic resonance is the idea that memory exists in nature and that past forms and behaviors influence present ones based on similarity.

He thinks some kind of memory in nature must exist because, in his view, evolutionary biology doesn’t make full sense without it. But he admits that while he’s fairly sure the phenomenon is real, he doesn’t know for certain that his specific explanation is correct.

He says it’s the only detailed model of its kind currently out there, though other, more general ideas touch on memory in the universe, like in Hindu and Buddhist beliefs about karma, which also involve effects traveling across time.

Sheldrake compares his situation to how science developed over time. For example, Michael Faraday proposed the existence of electric and magnetic fields without knowing exactly how they worked. Later, James Clerk Maxwell created a mathematical model involving the “ether,” which was widely accepted until Einste in’s theory of relativity showed that the ether didn’t exist.

Then, quantum physics introduced entirely new ideas. So, the models changed over time, but the actual phenomena—like electricity and magnetism—remained real and important. He sees his theory of morphic fields and resonance in the same way: the phenomenon may be real, but the model explaining it might evolve.

That’s why he keeps doing experiments. If he already knew the truth, he says, there’d be no need to keep testing his ideas. The point is to explore and discover, not to claim he already has all the answers.

Sheldrake says that his theory of morphic resonance, which he describes as a theory of memory, could have several real-world uses. He explains that this theory includes not only the memory we have in our minds but also a kind of collective memory that influences learning. According to him, if morphic resonance is real, then people could learn faster and better by tapping into the experiences of others who have already learned the same things in the past.

He says this might explain why people often learn practical skills, like sports or using tools, better through doing and repetition rather than through books. He thinks this approach could especially help in teaching languages.

For example, learners could benefit more from immersive, experience-based methods that connect with this collective memory instead of memorizing grammar rules and verb lists (like how he was taught French).

He also believes morphic resonance could be important in treating memory-related issues like Alzheimer’s or other psychological problems.

Looking ahead, he imagines that if we could build computers based on morphic resonance (which he says would need to be analog rather than digital), they might be able to access shared memory banks. These computers could lead to a type of artificial intelligence that is truly intelligent, not just simulating human thinking.

Sheldrake also talks about another area of his research: the idea of the extended mind. This includes things like the feeling of being stared at, telepathy, and intuitions about future events (what he calls “pre-sentiment”).

He believes that if we could train people to improve these intuitive skills, they might be better at sensing dangers or responding more naturally to situations in daily life. He says there’s a lot of potential for training in this area.

Sheldrake explains laws of nature were fixed at the moment of the Big Bang and never change. Instead, it suggests that just like nature evolves, the “laws” of nature might also change and grow over time. Instead of calling them laws (which is a very human concept), Sheldrake prefers to think of them as habits of nature—patterns that repeat and get stronger the more they happen, just like how animals or people develop habits. (Source)

He believes that everything in nature, including living things, thoughts, and even social behaviors, is guided by invisible fields called morphic fields. These fields carry memory from the past and influence present behavior. So if something has happened many times before, it’s more likely to happen again. That’s how species inherit instincts or how languages and cultures form and evolve.

He says these morphic fields affect our minds too. For example, the feeling that someone is staring at you, or the experience of thinking about someone just before they call you, might not be coincidences—they could be examples of telepathy through morphic fields. According to Sheldrake, this is not magic or paranormal, but a natural process. Experiments have shown that people often correctly guess who is calling them on the phone, and this might be a common form of human telepathy. Similar behavior is also seen in animals, like dogs, that know when their owners are coming home.

Morphic fields are not limited to the brain—they can reach far beyond the body, just like magnetic fields go beyond magnets or cell phone signals go beyond the phone. These fields help explain connections between people or animals, even over long distances.

Vicky Verma

• https://howandwhys.com/rupert-sheldrake-morphic-resonance/

 

Erich Von Däniken Changed NASA Engineer Mind, Convincing Him To Consider Ezekiel Vision As Alien Spacecraft

Erich Von Däniken Changed NASA Engineer Mind, Convincing Him To Consider Ezekiel Vision As Alien Spacecraft

By Vicky Verma

Posted on February 18, 2025

What did Ezekiel actually see? The story of the prophet Ezekiel is one of the more fascinating, especially when looked at through the lens of modern technology. Some people suggest that, instead of gods, ancient humans may have actually been visited by an advanced race. This idea, called the ancient astronaut theory, suggests that Ezekiel’s “vision” of a wheeled chariot, or Merkabah, could actually have been a spaceship from an advanced species.

One of the biggest supporters of this theory is Erich von Däniken. He argues that the Book of Ezekiel could be understood differently in this light, so much so that his ideas even changed the view of a NASA scientist who originally set out to disprove them.

Erich von Däniken, a Swiss author famous for his “ancient astronaut” theories (particularly in his book Chariots of the Gods), met Josef F. Blumrich, a NASA engineer. The meeting is said to have occurred in the 1970s, where von Däniken presented his idea that Ezekiel’s vision in the Bible might have been a description of an alien spacecraft rather than a divine chariot.

Blumrich, at the time, was skeptical of von Däniken’s theories. Initially, he sought to disprove them, thinking they were absurd. However, after investigating Ezekiel’s vision in more detail, Blumrich began to change his mind. He wrote a book called “The Spaceships of Ezekiel,” where he argued that Ezekiel’s vision could indeed describe an advanced spacecraft, specifically suggesting that the “wheels within wheels” might represent a form of advanced technology.

Blumrich went on to patent a design for an omnidirectional wheel, which he claimed was inspired by his interpretation of Ezekiel’s description. This was part of his attempt to demonstrate how Ezekiel might have described advanced, though hypothetical, technology.

Ezekiel is a key figure in Judaism and prominent in other Abrahamic biblical texts. Ezekiel was brought to Babylon in the first captivity of Israel and is described as a prophet.

One of the interesting characteristics of The Book of Ezekiel as a biblical text is that it is written using the pronoun, I, clearly showing it being written by Ezekiel himself as a first-person account, unlike many biblical texts written in the third person. This seems to lend a little more credit and personality to the story as it is told shortly after its occurrence.

The Flying Wheeled Chariot

“4 I looked, and I saw a windstorm coming out of the north—an immense cloud with flashing lightning and surrounded by brilliant light. The center of the fire looked like glowing metal, 5 and in the fire was what looked like four living creatures. In appearance their form was human, 6 but each of them had four faces and four wings. 7 Their legs were straight; their feet were like those of a calf and gleamed like burnished bronze. 8 Under their wings on their four sides they had human hands. All four of them had faces and wings, 9 and the wings of one touched the wings of another. Each one went straight ahead; they did not turn as they moved.” – Ezekiel 1

Ezekiel talks about seeing a chariot with wheels come down from the sky, driven by beings that looked like humans. While many versions of the Bible say this being on the chariot is God, von Däniken notes that the original Hebrew text doesn’t mention God; the word was added later.

Ezekiel’s description of the chariot landing sounds a lot like how a spacecraft might land. The strong wind, lightning, and bright lights are similar to what you might see when a spaceship lands, stirring up dust in a way no one from that time had ever seen. Ezekiel even says the fire powering the chariot looked like ‘glowing metal.’

There is a clear difference between this description and how Ezekiel’s vision is usually shown in Bible artwork. Many pictures leave out important details like the fire, the wheels that move in all directions, and the crystal dome around the heads of human-like beings.

The Four Living Creatures

“15 As I looked at the living creatures, I saw a wheel on the ground beside each creature with its four faces. 16 This was the appearance and structure of the wheels: They sparkled like topaz, and all four looked alike. Each appeared to be made like a wheel intersecting a wheel. 17 As they moved, they would go in any one of the four directions the creatures faced; the wheels did not change direction as the creatures went. 18 Their rims were high and awesome, and all four rims were full of eyes all around… 22 Spread out above the heads of the living creatures was what looked something like a vault, sparkling like crystal, and awesome.” – Ezekiel 1

Many people think the four creatures are cherubim or angel-like beings, especially in ancient Jewish (Genesis 3:24

and Christian (Exodus 25:18-20) texts. These creatures, looking like humans, are believed by some to be aliens who take Ezekiel in their UFO to a ‘temple’ on top of a mountain. During the journey, Ezekiel says he felt God’s hand on him, which could be understood as the strong forces of gravity or g-forces when the UFO lifts off. He is brought to their ‘temple,’ possibly a place or city where they live.

In many biblical stories, the Ark of the Covenant is an important object for von Däniken’s theory. He believes its mention in the Kebra Nagast, an Ethiopian Christian story about King Solomon, is the most significant. In this story, it’s said that King Solomon had flying machines not mentioned in the Bible, as well as the famous Ark.

The texts suggest people were afraid of the Ark because it killed those who came too close. Could it have been radioactive or electrically charged? Was it like a plutonium reactor?

Erich Von Däniken thinks there are other Bible verses that support his ancient astronaut theory. Some hint at places for spacecraft to land, similar to the one Ezekiel visited. One such place is the Chavin de Huantar temple in Peru, located high up on a mountain from an unknown culture.

The temple has winged figures and sculpted heads that look like they’re wearing helmets. Von Däniken believes these might be similar to the ones Ezekiel described. Could this be real evidence of an ancient UFO sighting, or just an imaginative idea?

Missouri Republican Eric Burlison attended a secret briefing on UFOs 10 months ago, but he says it hasn’t changed his beliefs. “There’s nothing that’s been said that’s changed my worldview,” he stated. He trusts the people who spoke about UFOs publicly but thinks there might be more to the story.

Burlison has suggested that UFOs could be angels sent by God. In an interview on “That UFO Podcast,” he explained that by “angels,” he means beings from other dimensions. He said, “They may not fit exactly the Biblical narrative, but whenever I use the term ‘angels,’ to me, it’s synonymous with an extradimensional being.”

On the podcast, Burlison also shared his views on different UFO theories, mentioning a report by UFO whistleblower David Grusch. Grusch claimed that the government secretly recovered alien spacecraft, with dead “pilots” inside. Burlison pointed to one theory in the report: the idea that these beings could exist in higher dimensions beyond our usual understanding of space and time. (Source)

He used an example of living on a flat surface and suddenly encountering a 3D object to explain higher-dimensional beings. In this case, he suggested that we live in a 3D world but could be dealing with beings from a dimension beyond ours, where distance doesn’t work the same way.

Burlison is doubtful about aliens traveling from distant planets to visit Earth, given the vast distances involved. He questioned why an advanced alien race would come so far only to crash on Earth. Instead, he thinks it’s more likely that these beings are extradimensional.

He added that religious texts, including the Bible, talk about God’s messengers or angels existing in higher dimensions. While Burlison acknowledges the visual evidence and pilots’ testimonies about UFOs, he thinks the explanation might not be as exciting as people hope. In his view, these sightings might be new propulsion technology being developed on Earth.

To make his point, he mentioned the discovery of the Higgs boson particle about ten years ago, which relates to gravity. Just as the nuclear bomb was developed after the discovery of nuclear fission, Burlison thinks scientists may be using the Higgs field to create new technology, possibly for advanced propulsion.

He’s not alone in connecting UFOs with religious ideas. Representative Tim Burchett has also said that UFOs are in the Bible, specifically referring to the book of Ezekiel. In Ezekiel 1:4-28, a vision describes an “immense cloud with flashing lightning,” “four living creatures” with human-like forms but with four faces and wings, and wheels that moved with them, which Burchett linked to UFOs.

Vicky Verma

• https://howandwhys.com/ezekiel-wheel-erich-von-daniken-nasa-engineer/

 

This Mexican Scientist Claimed We Live in a Holographic Matrix, Disappears Mysteriously After It

This Mexican Scientist Claimed We Live in a Holographic Matrix, Disappears Mysteriously After It

By Vicky Verma

Posted on February 11, 2025

 

Jacobo Grinberg (1946-?), the Mexican scientist who explored the link between science and the paranormal, was a psychologist and consciousness researcher. He conducted experiments in telepathy and extraocular vision.

Dr. Grinberg raised the possibility that, through consciousness, the human brain could have control over the universe in which we live. In the field of physics, the Lattice is the structure in which space-time is found. For Jacobo, this concept acquired a new meaning, leading him to coin the term syntergy, a neologism combining “synthesis” and “energy.”

His theory proposes that through the process by which the human brain decodes perceptual reality, it is possible to establish links with the Lattice and thereby make changes in space-time. He postulated that we live in an informational matrix, which he called “the hologram,” where it is possible to interact with perceptual reality not just as spectators but as active participants in constructing that reality.

From his brain experiments, Dr. Grinberg developed the syntergic theory, a term formed from the Spanish words síntesis (synthesis) and energía (energy).

Dr. Grinberg also explored the implications of the EPR paradox, which asserts that if quantum theory is a complete model of reality, non-local interactions should exist between particles. He aimed to prove that a quantum system in the brain creates a non-local EPR correlation among human brains. He called this phenomenon transferred potential (TP), suggesting that a brain, suitably prepared through meditation, can interact with other brains, both near and far, by directly involving consciousness without sensory transmission or local effects.

“When consciousness is free, when sensitivity is optimal, we are what the universe is. Ultimately everything is a manifestation of the brain structure, which in turn is a model of the entire universe. When we see the other, we see ourselves,” said Jacobo Grinberg.

Dr. Grinberg further proposed that his syntergic theory could explain the emergence of conscious experience, which he saw as the result of complex multidimensional interactions. The brain initiates an interaction between an energetic field (neuronal field) and space structure, thus giving rise to consciousness.

Contrary to naïve realism, which suggests that reality exists externally to the observer, Dr. Grinberg, adopting an ideological stance, proposed that perception is neuropsychologically constructed, with information existing in space as “complex patterns of energy.” Conscious experience, he believed, occurs when we synthesize this information-energy in space, thereby becoming syntergic. Neuronal changes in the brain cause micro-distortions in the framework of the space-time continuum, which then interact to create a “hypercomplex macro-distortion” of the neuronal field. The outcome of this process is perceptual experience.

Regarding vision, the neuronal and quantum fields’ components “fit together” in experience, minimizing the noise produced by their interaction through a specific, emergent interference pattern (IP). This pattern represents the structure of experience and contains the perceptual components perceived as lines and geometric forms, conceived as energetic forms of high complexity. The percepts, or images, we “objectively” see as colors and objects are ultimately products of the IP.

Dr. Grinberg’s ideas are related to the implicate order theory developed by American physicist David Bohm, in which space is conceived as a holographic “sea of potentialities” from which the universe and consciousness unfold explicitly. Here, the quantum wave/particle duality paradox is resolved, while the “principle of nonlocality”—the capacity of one particle to influence another instantaneously—is preserved.

The syntergic theory both reaffirms and challenges quantum physics by reinterpreting the concept of the Lattice. Dr. Grinberg suggested that, through consciousness, the human brain could control the universe in which we live.

Vicky Verma

• https://x.com/Unexplained2020/status/1885428147849482295

 

This Former NASA Engineer has Discovered a Way to Defy the Laws of Physics

This Former NASA Engineer has Discovered a Way to Defy the Laws of Physics

By Vicky Verma

Posted on February 4, 2025

 

This Former NASA Engineer has discovered a way to defy the laws of physics. His team claims that they have developed a device capable of generating enough thrust to counteract Earth’s gravity.

Dr. Charles Buhler, a seasoned NASA engineer and co-founder of Exodus Propulsion Technologies, claims his company’s propellantless propulsion drive defies the laws of physics.

Dr. Buhler, a NASA scientist, has worked on making space missions like the Space Shuttle and Mars Exploration safer. Now, he’s creating a way to clean dust off astronauts and equipment using electricity for NASA’s Moon mission. But that’s not all – he might have discovered a way to make a machine move without fuel, which would change space travel forever.

It’s a bold claim, and this may end up being filed alongside similar controversial concepts like the propellant-free EmDrive.

However, Buhler’s history as NASA’s subject matter expert on electrostatics has forced people to take note.

Dr. Buhler’s idea is based on a fresh look at gravity, which works like a heavy object bending a stretched rubber sheet. He believes he’s found a way to move in a straight line across this curved sheet, like taking a shortcut through space. This could make space travel faster and more efficient. While it might sound like science fiction, his work could open new doors for exploring space.

Dr. Buhler’s team also claims they’ve created 1G of thrust (the same force as Earth’s gravity) without using any fuel. If that’s true, it could spark a new era for humanity in space.

Vicky Verma

• https://x.com/Unexplained2020/status/1885428147849482295

 

Schrödinger Believed That There Was Only One Mind in the Universe

Schrödinger Believed That There Was Only One Mind in the Universe

By Vicky Verma

Posted on August 27, 2024

 

 

Schrödinger Believed That There Was Only One Mind in the Universe: Quantum Physicist & author of the famous Cat Paradox believed that our individual minds are not unique but rather like the reflected light from prisms.

Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger is known for the phrase “The total number of minds in the universe is one. In fact, consciousness is a singularity phasing within all beings.” which best summarizes his philosophical outlook on the nature of reality.

The phrase implies that the apparent multiplicity of minds is just an illusion and that there is only one mind, or one consciousness, that expresses itself in a myriad of ways.

This is what most people describe when they have a near-death experience. Usually, something like “I felt like I was a separate piece, but at the same time joined with everything and a part of one giant entity.”

In such a world view, a separation between subject and object does not exist, there is no existence of a subject on the one side and perception of an object on the other. In a world without the subject-object split, we are all an expression of the one.

One of the greatest Physicists Donald Hoffman [] & Schrödinger (1887–1961) believed that “The total number of minds in the universe is one.” That is, a universal Mind accounts for everything. 

[https://x.com/Unexplained2020/status/1821551442282328166]

In 1925, just a few months before Schrödinger discovered the most basic equation of quantum mechanics, he wrote down the first sketches of the ideas that he would later develop more thoroughly in “Mind and Matter”.

Already then, his thoughts on technical matters were inspired by what he took to be greater metaphysical (religious) questions. Early on, Schrödinger expressed the conviction that metaphysics does not come after physics, but inevitably precedes it. Metaphysics is not a deductive affair but a speculative one.

From the 1950s on, when Schrödinger ceased to actively work on the physics of his time, he focused more on wider philosophical and ethical issues related to science.

Back then, his conferences always ended with what he jokingly called the “second Schrödinger equation”: “Atman = Brahman”, the Indian doctrine of identity.

Schrödinger said that we make two big assumptions that we can’t prove or disprove:

1. There’s a world outside our own minds (that exists even when we’re not thinking about it).

2. There are many separate minds (like yours and mine).

We can’t test these assumptions because we can’t step outside our own experiences. But these assumptions create big problems:

1. How do our minds interact with the physical world? (Why does the world seem purely physical and not full of qualities like colors and sounds?)

2. How are our minds different from each other? (Why are we unique individuals?)

Schrödinger thought that we could solve these problems by looking at things differently. He didn’t agree with traditional Western ideas (like materialism and idealism), but he found inspiration in Eastern philosophies (like Indian ideas). He believed that there’s a simpler way to understand the world and our minds.

Inspired by Indian philosophy, Schrödinger had a mind-first, not matter-first, view of the universe. But he was a non-materialist of a rather special kind. He believed that there is only one mind in the universe; our individual minds are like the scattered light from prisms:

A metaphor that Schrödinger liked to invoke to illustrate this idea is the one of a crystal that creates a multitude of colors (individual selves) by refracting light (standing for the cosmic self that is equal to the essence of the universe).

We are all but aspects of one single mind that forms the essence of reality. He also referred to this as the doctrine of identity.

Accordingly, a non-dual form of consciousness, which must not be conflated with any of its single aspects, grounds the refutation of the (merely apparent) distinction into separate selves that inhabit a single world.

“Not only has none of us ever experienced more than one consciousness, but there is also no trace of circumstantial evidence of this ever happening anywhere in the world.”

Schrödinger drew remarkable consequences from this (in his book Mind and Matter (1958)).

– Every person is the same as every other person who has ever lived.

– There’s no real difference between you and someone who lived thousands of years ago.

He asked: “What makes you, YOU, and not someone else?” He didn’t think there was any scientific way to answer this question.

Schrödinger believed that there’s only one mind in the universe, shared by everyone. He thought this because:

– We only ever experience one consciousness at a time (our own).

– There’s no evidence that anyone has ever experienced multiple consciousnesses.

He compared this idea to John Wheeler’s idea that there’s only one electron in the universe. Schrödinger thought that just as all electrons are the same, all minds are the same too.

Some people might not agree with the ideas presented so far. We started with the idea that the Mind is the most important thing, and that’s a common idea throughout history. But then we added that individual minds (like yours and mine) can’t think or act independently from the universal Mind. This limits the power of the universal Mind.

It’s not clear why the universal Mind couldn’t give animals and humans the ability to think and act on their own. Just because we can only experience our own consciousness doesn’t mean we’re just extensions of the universal Mind.

This idea is especially problematic for humans, who deal with good and evil. If we’re all just one mind, then Martin Luther King and Josef Stalin are the same mind, which doesn’t make sense. Humans can choose to do good or bad things, which can’t be explained by just being different parts of a spectrum.

Your Very Own Consciousness Can Interact With the Whole Universe

A recent experiment suggests the brain is not too warm or wet for consciousness to exist as a quantum wave that connects with the rest of the universe.

Whether we create consciousness in our brains as a function of our neurons firing, or consciousness exists independently of us, there’s no universally accepted scientific explanation for where it comes from or where it lives. However, new research on the physics, anatomy, and geometry of consciousness has begun to reveal its possible form.

In other words, we may soon be able to identify a true architecture of consciousness.

 

Vicky Verma

• https://x.com/Unexplained2020/status/1826900994057187604